Gleerup G, Petersen J R, Mehlsen J, Winther K
Department of Cardiology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Angiology. 1996 Oct;47(10):951-5. doi: 10.1177/000331979604701003.
Thirteen patients with mild hypertension (untreated diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 114 mmHg) received, in random order, three successive treatments of four weeks with placebo, spirapril (6 mg daily), or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT2) (24 mg daily). At the end of each treatment, blood samples for assessment of platelet aggregation and platelet release of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and for assessment of fibrinolysis, estimated by tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 (PAI-1), and euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT), were taken, first at rest, then immediately after five to ten minutes of vigorous exercise, and finally after the subsequent hour of recovery rest. Platelet aggregation induced in vitro by adrenaline significantly decreased during treatment with HCT2, the threshold rising to 10 microM as compared with 1.0 with placebo (P < 0.05) at rest, and the threshold for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) aggregation also rose, from 2 microM to 4 (NS). The resting plasma PF4 value fell, although not significantly, during HCT2 treatment from the placebo value of 3.28 to 2.56 ng/mL. During spirapril treatment there was no change in the threshold of either adrenaline or ADP for aggregation of platelets sampled at rest, and the PF4 plasma levels showed no significant reductions at rest. However, during exercise PF4 showed an approximate doubling of the resting value irrespective of therapy. This exercise-induced increase in PF4 was significantly reduced by spirapril as compared with placebo (P < 0.05). ECLT and t-PA did not shift significantly from the placebo level during either therapy. PAI-1 did not change during spirapril therapy, but during HCT2 treatment it fell, although not significantly, to 9.36 IU/mL from 15.91 with placebo (NS). Spirapril and HCT2 did not produce any unwanted side effect on platelet function or fibrinolysis. HCT2 seems to decrease platelet activity at rest, whereas spirapril seems to some extent to decrease platelet activity at exercise.
13名轻度高血压患者(未经治疗时舒张压为95至114 mmHg),按随机顺序接受了三个连续为期四周的治疗,分别为安慰剂、螺普利(每日6 mg)或氢氯噻嗪(HCT2)(每日24 mg)。在每次治疗结束时,采集血样用于评估血小板聚集、血小板因子4(PF4)的血小板释放以及通过组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA)、纤溶酶原激活剂抑制剂1型(PAI-1)和优球蛋白凝块溶解时间(ECLT)评估纤溶,首先在静息状态下采集,然后在剧烈运动5至10分钟后立即采集,最后在随后一小时的恢复休息后采集。与安慰剂相比,在HCT2治疗期间,肾上腺素体外诱导的血小板聚集显著降低,静息时阈值升至10 μM,而安慰剂组为1.0 μM(P < 0.05),二磷酸腺苷(ADP)聚集的阈值也从2 μM升至4 μM(无统计学意义)。在HCT2治疗期间,静息血浆PF4值从安慰剂组的3.28 ng/mL降至2.56 ng/mL,虽未达显著水平。在螺普利治疗期间,静息时采集的血小板对肾上腺素或ADP聚集的阈值无变化,静息时PF4血浆水平也无显著降低。然而,无论接受何种治疗,运动期间PF4显示静息值大约翻倍。与安慰剂相比,螺普利显著降低了运动诱导的PF4升高(P < 0.05)。在两种治疗期间,ECLT和t-PA与安慰剂水平相比均无显著变化。在螺普利治疗期间,PAI-1无变化,但在HCT2治疗期间,虽未达显著水平,其从安慰剂组的15.91降至9.36 IU/mL(无统计学意义)。螺普利和HCT2对血小板功能或纤溶均未产生任何不良副作用。HCT2似乎降低静息时的血小板活性,而螺普利似乎在一定程度上降低运动时的血小板活性。