Suppr超能文献

普通降压治疗对睡眠呼吸障碍患者夜间高血压的影响甚微。

Little effect of ordinary antihypertensive therapy on nocturnal high blood pressure in patients with sleep disordered breathing.

作者信息

Pelttari L H, Hietanen E K, Salo T T, Kataja M J, Kantola I M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Turku University Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1998 Mar;11(3 Pt 1):272-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00469-x.

Abstract

The antihypertensive effects of four different antihypertensive medications (beta-blocking agent, atenolol 50 mg; calcium-antagonist, isradipine SRO [slow release] 2.5 mg; diuretic, hydrochlorothiazide [HCTZ] 25 mg; and angiotension converting enzyme-inhibitor, spirapril 6 mg) on obese patients with sleep disordered breathing and hypertension were compared by the ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM). Eighteen patients were randomized in a double-blind, crossover fashion to receive each of the four different medications for 8 weeks. ABPM was performed at baseline and after an 8-week treatment with these medications. A 2- to 3-week washout period occurred both at baseline and between each of the four medications. Three patients were omitted from statistical analysis because of technical problems of ABPM. Atenolol, isradipine SRO, and spirapril decreased significantly (P < .01) the mean 24-h systolic blood pressure, whereas HCTZ did not. The mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly after all four medications: 12 (SD+/-14) mm Hg with atenolol, 7 (SD+/-10) mm Hg with isradipine SRO, 3 mm Hg (SD+/-14) with HCTZ, and 6 (SD+/-15) mm Hg with spirapril (P < .01). During nighttime none of the medications reduced the mean diastolic or systolic blood pressure significantly. According to the 24-h blood pressure curve the influence of these four medications during the whole measurement period was not similar. Atenolol and spirapril lost their antihypertensive effect during the early morning hours. The antihypertensive effect of HCTZ varied markedly from hour to hour. The trough-to-peak ratio of no medication was >0.50. Negative correlation was observed between the apnea time and the mean systolic 24-h (r = -0.604, P = NS) and the mean systolic nocturnal blood pressure change (r = -0.590, P = NS). Our study revealed that the daytime high blood pressure was quite easily controlled by the ordinary monotherapy in these patients with partial upper airway obstruction and hypertension. Instead none of the medications used decreased nocturnal high blood pressure markedly.

摘要

通过动态血压监测(ABPM)比较了四种不同降压药物(β受体阻滞剂,阿替洛尔50毫克;钙拮抗剂,缓释伊拉地平2.5毫克;利尿剂,氢氯噻嗪[HCTZ]25毫克;血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂,螺普利6毫克)对肥胖合并睡眠呼吸障碍和高血压患者的降压效果。18例患者以双盲、交叉方式随机分组,接受四种不同药物治疗,每种药物治疗8周。在基线期和使用这些药物治疗8周后进行ABPM。在基线期以及四种药物治疗之间均有2至3周的洗脱期。由于ABPM技术问题,3例患者被排除在统计分析之外。阿替洛尔、缓释伊拉地平及螺普利显著降低(P<0.01)24小时平均收缩压,而HCTZ无此作用。四种药物治疗后24小时平均舒张压均显著降低:阿替洛尔降低12(标准差±14)毫米汞柱,缓释伊拉地平降低7(标准差±10)毫米汞柱,HCTZ降低3毫米汞柱(标准差±14),螺普利降低6(标准差±15)毫米汞柱(P<0.01)。夜间,所有药物均未显著降低平均舒张压或收缩压。根据24小时血压曲线,这四种药物在整个测量期间的影响并不相似。阿替洛尔和螺普利在清晨时段失去降压效果。HCTZ的降压效果随时间显著变化。无药物的谷峰比>0.50。呼吸暂停时间与24小时平均收缩压(r=-0.604,P=无显著性差异)及夜间平均收缩压变化(r=-0.590,P=无显著性差异)之间呈负相关。我们的研究表明,对于这些部分上气道阻塞合并高血压的患者,日间高血压通过普通单一疗法很容易得到控制。相反,所使用的药物均未显著降低夜间高血压。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验