• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格拉斯哥昏迷量表与功能转归之间的关系。

Relationship between Glasgow coma scale and functional outcome.

作者信息

Zafonte R D, Hammond F M, Mann N R, Wood D L, Black K L, Millis S R

机构信息

Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan, Detroit, USA.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Sep-Oct;75(5):364-9. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199609000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00002060-199609000-00012
PMID:8873704
Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is routinely used in the acute care setting after traumatic brain injury (TBI) to guide decisions in triage, based on its ability to predict morbidity and mortality. Although the GCS has been previously demonstrated to predict mortality, efficacy in prediction of functional outcome has not been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of the acute GCS in predicting functional outcome in survivors of TBI. This study used the Multicenter National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research TBI Model Systems database of 501 patients who had received acute medical care and inpatient rehabilitation within a coordinated neurotrauma program for treatment of TBI. Initial and lowest 24 hr GCS scores were correlated with the following outcome measures: the Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale (LCFS), and cognitive and motor components of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM(SM)-COG and FIM(SM)-M). Outcome data were collected at admission to and discharge from the inpatient TBI rehabilitation unit. Correlation analysis revealed only modest, but statistically significant, relationships between initial and lowest GCS scores and outcome variables. Initial and lowest GCS score comparison with outcome demonstrated the following correlation coefficients: admission DRS, -0.25 and -0.28; discharge DRS, -0.24 and -0.24; admission LCFS, 0.31 and 0.33; discharge LCFS, 0.27 and 0.25; admission FIM-COG, 0.36 and 0.37; discharge FIM-COG, 0.23 and 0.23; admission FIM-M, 0.31 and 0.31; discharge FIM-M, 0.25 and 0.21. The GCS as a single variable may have limited value as a predictor of functional outcome.

摘要

格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的急性护理环境中经常被用于指导分诊决策,这是基于其预测发病率和死亡率的能力。尽管先前已证明GCS可预测死亡率,但在预测功能结局方面的有效性尚未得到证实。本研究的目的是评估急性GCS在预测TBI幸存者功能结局中的价值。本研究使用了多中心国家残疾与康复研究所TBI模型系统数据库,该数据库包含501名在协调神经创伤项目中接受急性医疗护理和住院康复治疗的TBI患者。最初和最低的24小时GCS评分与以下结局指标相关:残疾评定量表(DRS)、兰乔洛斯阿米戈斯认知功能水平量表(LCFS)以及功能独立性测量的认知和运动部分(FIM(SM)-COG和FIM(SM)-M)。结局数据在患者入住和出院时收集自住院TBI康复单元。相关性分析显示,最初和最低的GCS评分与结局变量之间仅存在适度但具有统计学意义的关系。最初和最低GCS评分与结局的比较显示出以下相关系数:入院时DRS为-0.25和-0.28;出院时DRS为-0.24和-0.24;入院时LCFS为0.31和0.33;出院时LCFS为0.27和0.25;入院时FIM-COG为0.36和0.37;出院时FIM-COG为0.23和0.23;入院时FIM-M为0.31和0.31;出院时FIM-M为0.25和0.21。作为单一变量的GCS在预测功能结局方面可能价值有限。

相似文献

1
Relationship between Glasgow coma scale and functional outcome.格拉斯哥昏迷量表与功能转归之间的关系。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Sep-Oct;75(5):364-9. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199609000-00012.
2
Influence of early variables in traumatic brain injury on functional independence measure scores and rehabilitation length of stay and charges.创伤性脑损伤早期变量对功能独立性测量评分、康复住院时间及费用的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Sep;76(9):797-803. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80542-7.
3
Complicated mild traumatic brain injury on the inpatient rehabilitation unit: a multicenter analysis.住院康复科的复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤:一项多中心分析。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):260-71. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200605000-00006.
4
The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial.年龄对轻度创伤性脑损伤功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性多中心试验的6个月报告。
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000127767.83267.33.
5
Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis.创伤性脑损伤1年后成功重返工作的急性预测因素:一项多中心分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Feb;78(2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90252-5.
6
Glasgow Coma Scale score, mortality, and functional outcome in head-injured patients.格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、死亡率及头部受伤患者的功能转归
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1084-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000124283.02605.a5.
7
A follow-up study of older adults with traumatic brain injury: taking into account decreasing length of stay.对老年创伤性脑损伤患者的随访研究:考虑住院时间的缩短
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.309.
8
Revised trauma score: an additive predictor of disability following traumatic brain injury?修订创伤评分:创伤性脑损伤后残疾的累加预测指标?
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Nov-Dec;75(6):456-61. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199611000-00011.
9
Functional outcome of individuals with traumatic brain injury and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.创伤性脑损伤合并下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的功能预后
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999 Dec;14(6):558-66. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199912000-00004.
10
The relationship of Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score to rehabilitative potential in patients suffering traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的损伤严重程度评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分与康复潜力的关系。
Am Surg. 2003 Jun;69(6):491-7; discussion 497-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Lowenstein Communication Scale.洛温斯坦沟通量表的信度与效度
Neurol Int. 2025 Jul 29;17(8):116. doi: 10.3390/neurolint17080116.
2
Decompressive craniectomy in subarachnoid hemorrhage compared to other etiologies: An institutional experience of 11 years.与其他病因相比,蛛网膜下腔出血患者的减压性颅骨切除术:11年的机构经验
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 3;5:104203. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104203. eCollection 2025.
3
Traumatic brain injury: molecular biomarkers, genetics, secondary consequences, and medical management.
创伤性脑损伤:分子生物标志物、遗传学、继发性后果及医学管理
Front Neurosci. 2024 Oct 4;18:1446076. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1446076. eCollection 2024.
4
Factors Influencing Objective and Subjective Prospective Memory Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤中影响客观和主观前瞻性记忆测量的因素
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Jan 21;40(1):112-124. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae048.
5
Can we predict 1-year functional outcomes and mortality following hip fracture in middle-aged and geriatric patients at time of admission?我们能否在中老年髋部骨折患者入院时预测其 1 年的功能结局和死亡率?
Musculoskelet Surg. 2024 Mar;108(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00804-y. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
6
miR-211-5p targeting MMP9 regulates the expressions of AQP4 in traumatic brain injury.miR-211-5p 通过靶向 MMP9 调节创伤性脑损伤中 AQP4 的表达。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Aug;123(4):1321-1329. doi: 10.1007/s13760-023-02205-1. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
7
Psychometric analysis of the Glasgow Coma Scale and its sub-scale scores in a national retrospective cohort of patients with traumatic injuries.格拉斯哥昏迷量表及其子量表评分的心理计量学分析:一项全国性创伤性损伤患者回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 8;17(6):e0268527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268527. eCollection 2022.
8
Admission Lymphopenia is Associated With Discharge Disposition in Blunt Chest Wall Trauma Patients.入院时淋巴细胞减少与钝性胸壁创伤患者的出院去向有关。
J Surg Res. 2022 Feb;270:293-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
9
Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score.诊断意识水平:格拉斯哥昏迷量表总分的局限性。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec;38(23):3295-3305. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0199.
10
Who Is the Geriatric Trauma Patient? An Analysis of Patient Characteristics, Hospital Quality Measures, and Inpatient Cost.老年创伤患者是谁?对患者特征、医院质量指标和住院费用的分析。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Sep 15;11:2151459320955087. doi: 10.1177/2151459320955087. eCollection 2020.