• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿计算机断层扫描单纯镇静的疗效

Efficacy of simple sedation of pediatric computed tomography.

作者信息

Anderson R E, Osborn A G

出版信息

Radiology. 1977 Sep;124(3):739-40. doi: 10.1148/124.3.739.

DOI:10.1148/124.3.739
PMID:887768
Abstract

A mixture of meperidine, chlorpromazine, and promethazine was used for sedation prior to computed tomography in pediatric patients. Diagnostic-quality scans were obtained in 88% of cases, and there were no important complications. Advantages of routine use of sedation over general anesthesia include random scheduling of adults and children, independence from the other demands placed on the anesthesia service, less need to admit these children to the hospital, and low cost.

摘要

在儿科患者进行计算机断层扫描之前,使用哌替啶、氯丙嗪和异丙嗪的混合物进行镇静。88%的病例获得了诊断质量的扫描结果,且无重大并发症。常规使用镇静剂相对于全身麻醉的优势包括成人和儿童可随机安排检查时间、无需依赖麻醉科的其他服务需求、这些儿童较少需要住院以及成本较低。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of simple sedation of pediatric computed tomography.小儿计算机断层扫描单纯镇静的疗效
Radiology. 1977 Sep;124(3):739-40. doi: 10.1148/124.3.739.
2
Rectal thiopental versus an intramuscular cocktail for sedating children before computerized tomography.直肠注射硫喷妥钠与肌肉注射混合剂用于儿童计算机断层扫描前镇静的比较
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1980 Feb;37(2):222-4.
3
The intramuscular use of a combination of meperidine, promethazine and chlorpromazine for sedation of the child dental patient.哌替啶、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪联合肌肉注射用于儿童牙科患者的镇静。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1977 Nov-Dec;44(6):453-6.
4
Rectal thiopental compared with intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric sedation.直肠注射硫喷妥钠与肌肉注射哌替啶、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪用于小儿镇静的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Jun;20(6):644-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82384-4.
5
Oral ketamine/midazolam is superior to intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric cardiac catheterization.对于小儿心脏导管插入术,口服氯胺酮/咪达唑仑优于肌肉注射哌替啶、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪。
Anesth Analg. 2000 Feb;90(2):299-305. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200002000-00011.
6
Comparison of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate and intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for conscious sedation of children undergoing laceration repair.口服枸橼酸芬太尼与肌肉注射哌替啶、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪用于儿童撕裂伤修复清醒镇静的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Oct;28(4):385-90. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70001-x.
7
A comparative study of midazolam to meperidine/promethazine as an IM sedative technique for the pediatric dental patient.
ASDC J Dent Child. 1997 May-Jun;64(3):197-200, 165, 228.
8
Comparison of oral chloral hydrate with intramuscular ketamine, meperidine, and promethazine for pediatric sedation--preliminary report.口服水合氯醛与肌肉注射氯胺酮、哌替啶和异丙嗪用于儿科镇静的比较——初步报告
Anesth Prog. 1998 Spring;45(2):46-50.
9
Intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine: analysis of use and complications in 487 pediatric emergency department patients.肌内注射哌替啶、异丙嗪和氯丙嗪:487例儿科急诊科患者的使用情况及并发症分析
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 May;18(5):528-33. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80838-8.
10
The choice of sedation for computed tomography in children: a prospective evaluation.儿童计算机断层扫描镇静的选择:一项前瞻性评估。
Radiology. 1982 May;143(2):475-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071350.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative review of the adverse effects of sedatives used in children undergoing outpatient procedures.门诊手术患儿使用镇静剂的不良反应比较综述
Drug Saf. 1996 Mar;14(3):146-57. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199614030-00002.
2
Soft tissue pseudotumor following intramuscular injection of "DPT": a pitfall in magnetic resonance imaging.肌肉注射“百白破”疫苗后出现的软组织假瘤:磁共振成像中的一个陷阱
Skeletal Radiol. 1987;16(6):469-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00350542.
3
CT whole-body scanning and scintigraphy in children with malignant tumours. A comparative retrospective study.
Pediatr Radiol. 1979 Apr 19;8(2):103-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00974000.