• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童计算机断层扫描镇静的选择:一项前瞻性评估。

The choice of sedation for computed tomography in children: a prospective evaluation.

作者信息

Thompson J R, Schneider S, Ashwal S, Holden B S, Hinshaw D B, Hasso A N

出版信息

Radiology. 1982 May;143(2):475-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071350.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071350
PMID:7071350
Abstract

A prospective study of 582 pediatric cranial computed tomographic (CT) examinations was made in order to determine the efficacy and safety of two sedation regimens and general anesthesia. Two hundred seventy-nine outpatients were randomly given oral chloral hydrate (80 mg/kg) or an intramuscular preparation composed of atropine, meperidine, promethazine, and secobarbital (AMPS). Three hundred three inpatients were randomly administered chloral hydrate, the AMPS, or endotracheal anesthesia. Intravenous supplementation of the sedation was limited by the protocol to a maximum secobarbital dosage of 2 mg/kg. An additional retrospective analysis was made of 316 scan attempts obtained outside the study during the same period. A failed CT examination was defined as one that could not be completed or one that showed motion artifacts on two or more scan pairs after two scan pair repeats. The failure rate was 15% for the chloral hydrate group and 12% for the AMPS group. No motion artifacts were present on 94% of the completed studies. There was no mortality, but major and minor complications occurred in 3.5% of the randomized group. It was concluded that each of the methods had proved acceptably safe and effective and that measures can be taken to decrease complications and sedation failures further.

摘要

为了确定两种镇静方案及全身麻醉的有效性和安全性,对582例儿科头颅计算机断层扫描(CT)检查进行了一项前瞻性研究。279例门诊患者被随机给予口服水合氯醛(80mg/kg)或由阿托品、哌替啶、异丙嗪和司可巴比妥组成的肌肉注射制剂(AMPS)。303例住院患者被随机给予水合氯醛、AMPS或气管内麻醉。根据方案,静脉补充镇静剂时司可巴比妥的最大剂量限制为2mg/kg。同期对研究外获得的316次扫描尝试进行了一项额外的回顾性分析。CT检查失败定义为无法完成的检查或在重复扫描两对后两个或更多扫描对上出现运动伪影的检查。水合氯醛组的失败率为15%,AMPS组为12%。94%的完成检查未出现运动伪影。无死亡病例,但随机分组的患者中有3.5%发生了严重和轻微并发症。得出的结论是,每种方法都已证明具有可接受的安全性和有效性,并且可以采取措施进一步降低并发症和镇静失败的发生率。

相似文献

1
The choice of sedation for computed tomography in children: a prospective evaluation.儿童计算机断层扫描镇静的选择:一项前瞻性评估。
Radiology. 1982 May;143(2):475-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071350.
2
Comparison of oral chloral hydrate with intramuscular ketamine, meperidine, and promethazine for pediatric sedation--preliminary report.口服水合氯醛与肌肉注射氯胺酮、哌替啶和异丙嗪用于儿科镇静的比较——初步报告
Anesth Prog. 1998 Spring;45(2):46-50.
3
Comparing the safety, efficacy and recovery of intranasal midazolam vs. oral chloral hydrate and promethazine.比较鼻内咪达唑仑与口服水合氯醛及异丙嗪的安全性、有效性和恢复情况。
Pediatr Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct;23(5):424-30.
4
Chloral hydrate sedation of children undergoing CT and MR imaging: safety as judged by American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.水合氯醛对接受CT和MR成像的儿童进行镇静:根据美国儿科学会指南判断安全性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Oct;165(4):905-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.4.7676990.
5
Sedation of children for CT and MRI scanning.儿童CT和MRI扫描的镇静
Radiol Technol. 1990 Mar-Apr;61(4):283-5.
6
Efficacy of simple sedation of pediatric computed tomography.小儿计算机断层扫描单纯镇静的疗效
Radiology. 1977 Sep;124(3):739-40. doi: 10.1148/124.3.739.
7
Chloral hydrate, chloral hydrate--promethazine and chloral hydrate -hydroxyzine efficacy in electroencephalography sedation.水合氯醛、水合氯醛 - 异丙嗪以及水合氯醛 - 羟嗪在脑电图镇静中的疗效。
Indian J Pediatr. 2014 Jun;81(6):541-6. doi: 10.1007/s12098-013-1298-y. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
Current premedicating trends in pedodontics.儿童牙科学当前的术前用药趋势。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1973 May-Jun;40(3):185-7.
9
The safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation for pediatric ophthalmic procedures: a retrospective review.水合氯醛用于小儿眼科手术镇静的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014 May-Jun;51(3):154-9. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20140311-01. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
10
A randomized controlled trial of sedation in the critically ill.危重症患者镇静的随机对照试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 1997;7(5):405-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1997.d01-109.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.水合氯醛作为镇静剂在儿科神经诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD011786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011786.pub3.
2
Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.水合氯醛作为儿童神经诊断程序中的镇静剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD011786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011786.pub2.
3
Comparing Two Different Doses of Intravenous Midazolam in Pediatric Sedation and Analgesia.
比较两种不同剂量静脉注射咪达唑仑用于小儿镇静镇痛的效果
Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Nov;4(4):192-195.
4
Oral Chloral Hydrate Compare with Rectal Thiopental in Pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia; a Randomized Clinical Trial.小儿程序性镇静镇痛中口服水合氯醛与直肠注射硫喷妥钠的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Emerg (Tehran). 2014 Spring;2(2):85-9.
5
The pediatric sedation service: who is appropriate to sedate, which medications should I use, who should prescribe the drugs, how do I bill?儿科镇静服务:谁适合进行镇静,我应该使用哪些药物,谁应该开具这些药物,我该如何计费?
Pediatr Radiol. 2008 May;38 Suppl 2:S218-24. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-0769-1.
6
Randomised double-blind clinical trial of intermediate- versus high-dose chloral hydrate for neuroimaging of children.中剂量与高剂量水合氯醛用于儿童神经成像的随机双盲临床试验。
Neuroradiology. 1995 Nov;37(8):687-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00593395.
7
Combination effects of chloral hydrate and nitrous oxide/oxygen in the mouse staircase test.水合氯醛与一氧化二氮/氧气在小鼠阶梯试验中的联合效应
Anesth Prog. 1988 May-Jun;35(3):116-20.
8
Respiratory insufficiency following chloral hydrate sedation in two children with Leigh disease (subacute necrotizing encephalomyelopathy).
Pediatr Radiol. 1990;20(4):287-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02019670.
9
Administration of oral chloral hydrate to paediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.对接受磁共振成像检查的儿科患者给予口服水合氯醛。
Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1992 Dec 11;14(6):349-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01970170.