Chiba K, Fujimura Y, Toyama Y, Fujii E, Nakanishi T, Hirabayashi K
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Spinal Disord. 1996 Aug;9(4):267-76.
Treatment results in 104 patients with odontoid fractures were reviewed. There were 2 type I, 62 type II, 32 type III fractures and eight epiphysiolyses in children <7 years old. Thirty-seven patients were managed nonoperatively using plaster casts, cervical braces, or halo devices. Sixty-seven patients were treated surgically including anterior screw fixation (ASF), posterior fusion (PF), and transoral anterior fusion (TAF). Plaster casts and cervical braces were effective for type I fractures and epiphysiolyses only. Halo devices provided successful results in stable type III fractures. ASF is the treatment of choice for most type II and unstable III fractures including some old cases. PF also provided successful union, although impaired cervical motion remained. It should be reserved for irreducible fractures, established nonunions, and as a salvage procedure. TAF should be limited to exceptional cases requiring anterior spinal cord decompression.
回顾了104例齿状突骨折患者的治疗结果。其中有2例I型骨折、62例II型骨折、32例III型骨折以及8例7岁以下儿童的骨骺分离。37例患者采用石膏固定、颈托或头环装置进行非手术治疗。67例患者接受了手术治疗,包括前路螺钉固定(ASF)、后路融合(PF)和经口前路融合(TAF)。石膏固定和颈托仅对I型骨折和骨骺分离有效。头环装置对稳定的III型骨折取得了成功的治疗效果。ASF是大多数II型和不稳定III型骨折(包括一些陈旧病例)的首选治疗方法。PF也实现了成功愈合,尽管颈椎活动仍有受限。它应保留用于不可复位的骨折、已形成的骨不连以及作为挽救手术。TAF应仅限于需要进行前路脊髓减压的特殊病例。