Takezaki N, Nei M
Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.
Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):389-99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.389.
Recently many investigators have used microsatellite DNA loci for studying the evolutionary relationships of closely related populations or species, and some authors proposed new genetic distance measures for this purpose. However, the efficiencies of these distance measures in obtaining the correct tree topology remains unclear. We therefore investigated the probability of obtaining the correct topology (PC) for these new distances as well as traditional distance measures by using computer simulation. We used both the infinite-allele model (IAM) and the stepwise mutation model (SMM), which seem to be appropriate for classical markers and microsatellite loci, respectively. The results show that in both the IAM and SMM CAVALLI-SFORZA and EDWARDS' chord distance (DC) and NEI et al.'s DA distance generally show higher PC values than other distance measures, whether the bottleneck effect exists or not. For estimating evolutionary times, however, NEI's standard distance and GOLDSTEIN et al.'s (delta mu)2 are more appropriate than other distances. Microsatellite DNA seems to be very useful for clarifying the evolutionary relationships of closely related populations.
最近,许多研究人员利用微卫星DNA位点来研究亲缘关系较近的种群或物种的进化关系,并且一些作者为此目的提出了新的遗传距离测量方法。然而,这些距离测量方法在获得正确的树形拓扑结构方面的效率仍不明确。因此,我们通过计算机模拟研究了这些新距离以及传统距离测量方法获得正确拓扑结构的概率(PC)。我们使用了无限等位基因模型(IAM)和逐步突变模型(SMM),这两种模型似乎分别适用于经典标记和微卫星位点。结果表明,在IAM和SMM中,无论瓶颈效应是否存在,卡瓦利-斯福尔扎和爱德华兹的弦距离(DC)以及内等人的DA距离通常比其他距离测量方法显示出更高的PC值。然而,对于估计进化时间,内的标准距离和戈德斯坦等人的(δμ)²比其他距离更合适。微卫星DNA似乎对于阐明亲缘关系较近的种群的进化关系非常有用。