Geraci E, Geraci T
University of California, San Francisco, USA.
J Neurosci Nurs. 1996 Aug;28(4):222-4, 229-33. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199608000-00004.
During the past decade, mounting controversy surrounding the use of hyperventilation for the treatment of head injury has raised concerns about its safety and therapeutic benefits. A recent investigation of the medical literature was conducted to determine if outcomes for the head-injured patient continued to support the use of indiscriminate, and often unmonitored, hyperventilation in the pre-hospital and early hospital phases of care, and to determine if current investigators are recommending the use of hyperventilation for the initial treatment of all unconscious head-injured patients. Findings suggest that head-injured patients in the pre-hospital and early phases of care are at increased risk for suffering hyperventilation-induced secondary brain injury. Current researchers are now recommending a highly monitored, cautions and selective approach to care; this approach calls our current practice into question.
在过去十年中,围绕过度换气用于治疗头部损伤的争议不断升级,引发了人们对其安全性和治疗效果的担忧。最近对医学文献进行了一项调查,以确定头部受伤患者的治疗结果是否仍支持在院前和早期医院护理阶段不加区别且通常无监测地使用过度换气,以及确定当前的研究人员是否建议对所有昏迷的头部受伤患者进行初始治疗时使用过度换气。研究结果表明,处于院前和早期护理阶段的头部受伤患者遭受过度换气诱发的继发性脑损伤的风险增加。目前的研究人员现在建议采用高度监测、谨慎和选择性的护理方法;这种方法对我们目前的做法提出了质疑。