Guillevin L, Lhote F, Amouroux J, Gherardi R, Callard P, Casassus P
Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France.
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Oct;35(10):958-64. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.10.958.
The present study attempted to define the clinical, radiological, immunological and pathological characteristics of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and to separate them from classic PAN (c-PAN) and Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS). In most cases, patients presenting microaneurysms and/or multiple vessel stenoses, which reflect medium-sized vessel involvement, did not have antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) (6.6%). Conversely, patients with glomerulonephritis almost never had abnormal angiograms. Furthermore, the clinical characteristics of ANCA-positive patients also indicate small-sized vessel involvement. Skin involvement (73.1 vs 26.7%, P < or = 0.05), glomerulonephritis (38.5 vs 0%, P < or = 0.001) and the presence of ANCA (34.6 vs 6.7%, P < or = 0.05) were significantly more frequent in patients with normal than abnormal angiograms, respectively. Conversely, hypertension (66.7 vs 23.1%, P < or = 0.02), renal vasculitis (46.7 vs 0%, P < or = 0.001) and hepatitis B antigenaemia (60 vs 11.5%, P < or = 0.01) were significantly more common in patients with abnormal angiograms. Stratification of patients according to vessel size showed that, except for skin involvement (P < or = 0.05) and glomerulonephritis (P < or = 0.01), which are direct manifestations of small-sized vessel diseases, clinical symptoms of PAN or CSS, angiographic findings and ANCA were not correlated to arteriole size. Although at present it is not possible to separate definitively MPA from c-PAN, our results show that ANCA should be considered diagnostic for MPA and, in most cases, should be an exclusion criterion for c-PAN. Conversely, small-sized vessel involvement can be observed in patients presenting characteristics of c-PAN, MPA or CSS and, therefore, is not a sufficient criterion for assigning diagnosis.
本研究试图明确显微镜下多血管炎(MPA)的临床、放射学、免疫学及病理学特征,并将其与经典结节性多动脉炎(c-PAN)及变应性肉芽肿性血管炎(CSS)相区分。在大多数情况下,出现微动脉瘤和/或多处血管狭窄(提示中等大小血管受累)的患者并无抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)(6.6%)。相反,患有肾小球肾炎的患者血管造影几乎均无异常。此外,ANCA阳性患者的临床特征也提示小血管受累。血管造影正常的患者皮肤受累(73.1%对26.7%,P≤0.05)、肾小球肾炎(38.5%对0%,P≤0.001)及ANCA阳性(34.6%对6.7%,P≤0.05)的发生率分别显著高于血管造影异常的患者。相反,血管造影异常的患者高血压(66.7%对23.1%,P≤0.0)、肾血管炎(46.7%对0%,P≤0.001)及乙肝表面抗原血症(60%对11.5%,P≤0.01)明显更为常见。根据血管大小对患者进行分层显示,除皮肤受累(P≤0.05)和肾小球肾炎(P≤0.01)(小血管疾病的直接表现)外,PAN或CSS的临床症状、血管造影表现及ANCA与小动脉大小无关。虽然目前尚无法将MPA与c-PAN明确区分,但我们的结果表明,ANCA应被视为MPA的诊断依据,且在大多数情况下应作为c-PAN的排除标准。相反,具有c-PAN、MPA或CSS特征的患者可出现小血管受累,因此,这并非诊断的充分标准。