Thomas J W
Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029, USA.
Inquiry. 1996 Fall;33(3):258-70.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether readmission rates, adjusted to account for differences in clinical characteristics of patients treated, provide valid information on hospital quality of care. Twelve clinical conditions were selected. Condition-specific models to predict readmission risk were estimated using Medicare UB-82 claims data. These models then were used to calculate readmission risk probabilities for patients whose medical records had been reviewed for quality of care by a Medicare peer review organization. I hypothesized that patients who received poor quality care during a hospitalization episode would be more likely to be readmitted after discharge than those who received acceptable quality care. My analysis found no support for this hypothesis. In each of the 12 clinical conditions studied, readmission rates of cases that received poor quality care were essentially the same as those whose care was judged acceptable. This was true both for readmission rates that were adjusted for patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, and for unadjusted rates, such as those typically displayed in hospital report cards.
本研究的目的是确定经调整以考虑所治疗患者临床特征差异后的再入院率,是否能提供有关医院护理质量的有效信息。选取了12种临床病症。使用医疗保险UB - 82理赔数据估计特定病症的预测再入院风险模型。然后,这些模型被用于计算那些病历已由医疗保险同行评审组织评审护理质量的患者的再入院风险概率。我假设在住院期间接受劣质护理的患者出院后比接受可接受质量护理的患者更有可能再次入院。我的分析没有支持这一假设。在所研究的12种临床病症中,接受劣质护理的病例的再入院率与护理被判定为可接受的病例的再入院率基本相同。无论是针对根据患者人口统计学和临床特征调整后的再入院率,还是针对未调整的率(如医院报告卡中通常显示的那些),都是如此。