Todd M M, Weeks J
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1996 Oct;8(4):296-303. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199610000-00007.
While intravenous and volatile anesthetics have widely differing effects on cerebral blood flow (CBF), clinical studies suggest that the relative differences in their effects on intracranial pressure (ICP) may be smaller. Because acute changes in ICP are determined primarily by changes in cerebral blood volume (CBV), we compared the impact of propofol, pentobarbital, and isoflurane on CBF and CBV in rats. Equipotent doses of the three agents were determined by tail-clamp studies. Animals were then anesthetized with propofol (20 mg/kg load, 38 mg.kg-1.h-1 infusion), pentobarbital (30 mg/kg load, 20 mg.kg-1.h-1 infusion), or isoflurane 1.6-1.8%. Two hours later, CBF and CBV were measured using 3H-nicotine as a CBF tracer, and 14C-dextran and 99mTc-labeled red cells as markers for cerebral plasma and red blood cell volumes (CPV and CRBCV), respectively. Total CBV was the sum of CPV and CRBCV. CBF was 2.0-2.6 times greater with isoflurane than with propofol or pentobarbital (137 vs. 67 and 52 ml.100 g-1.min-1, respectively). By contrast, while CBV was greater in the isoflurane group than in either the propofol or pentobarbital groups, the magnitude of the intergroup differences were much smaller (propofol = 2.49 +/- 0.28 ml/100 g; pentobarbital = 2.27 +/- 0.15 ml/100 g; isoflurane = 2.77 +/- 0.24 ml/100 g, mean +/- SD). These results suggest that the simple measurement of CBF may not adequately describe the cerebrovascular effects of an anesthetic, at least with respect to predicting the magnitude of the agents likely effects on ICP.
虽然静脉麻醉药和挥发性麻醉药对脑血流量(CBF)的影响差异很大,但临床研究表明,它们对颅内压(ICP)的影响的相对差异可能较小。由于ICP的急性变化主要由脑血容量(CBV)的变化决定,我们比较了丙泊酚、戊巴比妥和异氟烷对大鼠CBF和CBV的影响。通过尾部夹闭研究确定了三种药物的等效剂量。然后用丙泊酚(负荷剂量20mg/kg,输注速度38mg·kg-1·h-1)、戊巴比妥(负荷剂量30mg/kg,输注速度20mg·kg-1·h-1)或1.6 - 1.8%的异氟烷对动物进行麻醉。两小时后,使用3H-尼古丁作为CBF示踪剂,14C-葡聚糖和99mTc标记的红细胞分别作为脑血浆和红细胞体积(CPV和CRBCV)的标志物来测量CBF和CBV。总CBV是CPV和CRBCV之和。异氟烷组的CBF比丙泊酚组或戊巴比妥组高2.0 - 2.6倍(分别为137 vs. 67和52ml·100g-1·min-1)。相比之下,虽然异氟烷组的CBV高于丙泊酚组或戊巴比妥组,但组间差异的幅度要小得多(丙泊酚 = 2.49 +/- 0.28ml/100g;戊巴比妥 = 2.27 +/- 0.15ml/100g;异氟烷 = 2.77 +/- 0.24ml/100g,平均值 +/- 标准差)。这些结果表明,至少在预测药物对ICP可能影响的程度方面,简单测量CBF可能无法充分描述麻醉药对脑血管的影响。