Lavazza A, Scicluna M T, Capucci L
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia 'Bruno Ubertini' Brescia, Italy.
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1996 Sep;43(7):401-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1996.tb00332.x.
The European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV) and the rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHDV) virus were inoculated in hares and rabbits to discover whether the homologous and heterologous host could be infected. The aims were to confirm the results of previous studies that showed the existence of antigenic differences between these two viruses, and also to define the role attributed to the hare in transmission to rabbits of a disease, EBHS, initially mistaken for RHD. During the trials, clinical symptoms and pathological lesions were noted, and virological and serological analysis were conducted, using specific tests set up for both diseases. The hares infected with EBHSV died of an acute form of EBHS, whereas the rabbits remained healthy. The low serological response in these rabbits towards the EBHSV did not protect them against RHDV. Similarly, hares inoculated with RHDV remained healthy and showed a low anti-RHDV antibody titre but died when challenged with EBHSV.
将欧洲棕兔综合征病毒(EBHSV)和兔出血性疾病(RHDV)病毒接种到野兔和家兔体内,以探究同源和异源宿主是否会被感染。目的是确认先前研究的结果,这些结果表明这两种病毒之间存在抗原差异,同时确定野兔在一种最初被误诊为兔出血症(RHD)的疾病——欧洲棕兔综合征(EBHS)传播给家兔过程中所起的作用。在试验过程中,记录临床症状和病理损伤,并使用针对这两种疾病建立的特定检测方法进行病毒学和血清学分析。感染EBHSV的野兔死于急性EBHS,而家兔保持健康。这些家兔对EBHSV的血清学反应较低,无法保护它们抵御RHDV。同样,接种RHDV的野兔保持健康,抗RHDV抗体滴度较低,但在受到EBHSV攻击时死亡。