Jones A M, Doust J H
Chelsea School Research Centre, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
J Sports Sci. 1996 Aug;14(4):321-7. doi: 10.1080/02640419608727717.
When running indoors on a treadmill, the lack of air resistance results in a lower energy cost compared with running outdoors at the same velocity. A slight incline of the treadmill gradient can be used to increase the energy cost in compensation. The aim of this study was to determine the treadmill gradient that most accurately reflects the energy cost of outdoor running. Nine trained male runners, thoroughly habituated to treadmill running, ran for 6 min at six different velocities (2.92, 3.33, 3.75, 4.17, 4.58 and 5.0 m s-1) with 6 min recovery between runs. This routine was repeated six times, five times on a treadmill set at different grades (0%, 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%) and once outdoors along a level road. Duplicate collections of expired air were taken during the final 2 min of each run to determine oxygen consumption. The repeatability of the methodology was confirmed by high correlations (r = 0.99) and non-significant differences between the duplicate expired air collections and between the repeated runs at 0% grade. The relationship between oxygen uptake (VO2) and velocity for each grade was highly linear (r > 0.99). At the two lowest velocities, VO2 during road running was not significantly different from treadmill running at 0% or 1% grade, but was significantly less than 2% and 3% grade. For 3.75 m s-1, the VO2 during road running was significantly different from treadmill running at 0%, 2% and 3% grades but not from 1% grade. For 4.17 and 4.58 m s-1, the VO2 during road running was not significantly different from that at 1% or 2% grade but was significantly greater than 0% grade and significantly less than 3% grade. At 5.0 m s-1, the VO2 for road running fell between the VO2 value for 1% and 2% grade treadmill running but was not significantly different from any of the treadmill grade conditions. This study demonstrates equality of the energetic cost of treadmill and outdoor running with the use of a 1% treadmill grade over a duration of approximately 5 min and at velocities between 2.92 and 5.0 m s-1.
在跑步机上室内跑步时,与以相同速度在室外跑步相比,缺乏空气阻力会导致能量消耗更低。跑步机坡度稍有倾斜可用于增加能量消耗以作补偿。本研究的目的是确定最准确反映室外跑步能量消耗的跑步机坡度。九名训练有素的男性跑步者,已完全适应跑步机跑步,以六种不同速度(2.92、3.33、3.75、4.17、4.58和5.0米/秒)各跑6分钟,每次跑步之间休息6分钟。此程序重复六次,五次在设置了不同坡度(0%、0%、1%、2%、3%)的跑步机上进行,一次在室外平坦道路上进行。在每次跑步的最后2分钟收集两份呼出气体样本以测定耗氧量。通过高相关性(r = 0.99)以及两份呼出气体样本之间和在0%坡度下重复跑步之间无显著差异,证实了该方法的可重复性。每个坡度下摄氧量(VO2)与速度之间的关系呈高度线性(r > 0.99)。在两个最低速度下,室外跑步时的VO2与0%或1%坡度的跑步机跑步时相比无显著差异,但显著低于2%和3%坡度。对于3.75米/秒的速度,室外跑步时的VO2与0%、2%和3%坡度的跑步机跑步时相比有显著差异,但与1%坡度时相比无显著差异。对于4.17和4.58米/秒的速度,室外跑步时的VO2与1%或2%坡度时相比无显著差异,但显著高于0%坡度且显著低于3%坡度。在5.0米/秒时,室外跑步的VO2介于1%和2%坡度跑步机跑步的VO2值之间,但与任何跑步机坡度条件相比均无显著差异。本研究表明,在大约5分钟的持续时间内,以及在2.92至5.0米/秒的速度下,使用1%的跑步机坡度时,跑步机跑步和室外跑步的能量消耗相当。