• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种尿素酶试验检测胃活检标本中幽门螺杆菌的比较。

Comparison of three urease tests for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens.

作者信息

Boyanova L, Stancheva I, Todorov D, Kumanova R, Petrov S, Vladimirov B, Pehlivanov N, Mitova R, Chakarski I, Churchev I

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Sep;8(9):911-4.

PMID:8889460
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To propose two modified urease tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The presence of H. pylori infection was determined in 237 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Three media were used for the urease tests: Christensen's 2% urea broth and two urea agar media, modified by increasing the concentration of urea (to 4% and 10%) and phenol red and omitting the nutrients.

RESULTS

The modified tests had good sensitivity (> 78%), specificity (96%) and accuracy (> or = 86%) at 2 h using small amounts (15%) of biopsy homogenates. They were statistically more sensitive and accurate than Christensen's broth.

CONCLUSION

Both the modified 4% and 10% urea agar tests are simple, sensitive and specific and can be performed with small amounts of sample.

摘要

目的

提出两种改良脲酶试验,用于检测胃活检标本中的幽门螺杆菌。

患者与方法

对237例接受上消化道内镜检查的患者进行幽门螺杆菌感染检测。三种培养基用于脲酶试验:克里斯滕森2%尿素肉汤和两种尿素琼脂培养基,通过提高尿素浓度(至4%和10%)、加入酚红并省略营养成分进行改良。

结果

改良试验在2小时时使用少量(15%)活检匀浆具有良好的敏感性(>78%)、特异性(96%)和准确性(≥86%)。它们在统计学上比克里斯滕森肉汤更敏感、更准确。

结论

改良的4%和10%尿素琼脂试验均简单、敏感且特异,且可用少量样本进行检测。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three urease tests for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens.三种尿素酶试验检测胃活检标本中幽门螺杆菌的比较。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Sep;8(9):911-4.
2
Evaluation of a new urease reagent strip for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens.一种用于检测胃活检标本中幽门螺杆菌的新型尿素酶试纸条的评估。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Nov;90(11):1965-8.
3
Evaluation of the "one-minute" test for detecting Helicobacter (Campylobacter) pylori infection.
Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995 Mar;24(1):81-4.
4
Biopsy site for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者中用于检测幽门螺杆菌感染的活检部位。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Mar;24(3):469-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05679.x. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
5
Sensitivity and specificity of various diagnostic tests in the detection of Helicobacter pylori.各种诊断测试在检测幽门螺杆菌中的敏感性和特异性。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003 Feb;13(2):90-3.
6
Gastric juice urease test and brushing urease test for Helicobacter pylori detection.用于检测幽门螺杆菌的胃液尿素酶试验和刷检尿素酶试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Jun;85 Suppl 1:S74-8.
7
Detection methods of Helicobacter pylori: accuracy and costs.幽门螺杆菌的检测方法:准确性与成本
Am Surg. 1997 Aug;63(8):665-8.
8
Role of ELISA in H. pylori detection and its correlation with urease test.酶联免疫吸附测定法在幽门螺杆菌检测中的作用及其与尿素酶试验的相关性。
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2003 Jul;46(3):511-4.
9
Realities of diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice: a case for non-invasive indirect methodologies.临床实践中诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的现状:非侵入性间接方法的应用实例
Yale J Biol Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;71(2):81-90.
10
Noninvasive tests as a substitute for histology in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.非侵入性检测作为组织学的替代方法用于幽门螺杆菌感染的诊断。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Jul;52(1):20-6. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.106686.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis of Using Invasive and Noninvasive Approaches.使用侵入性和非侵入性方法进行诊断。 (你提供的原文表述不太完整准确,推测完整内容可能是“Diagnosis of [某种疾病或情况] Using Invasive and Noninvasive Approaches” )
J Pathog. 2018 May 22;2018:9064952. doi: 10.1155/2018/9064952. eCollection 2018.
2
Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.幽门螺杆菌检测及抗菌药物敏感性试验。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Apr;20(2):280-322. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00033-06.