Bergman B, Ericsson E
Department of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge Hospital, Sweden.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 Sep;94(3):168-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09843.x.
The aim of this study was to analyse the frequency and pattern of family (domestic) violence in a group of psychiatric in-patients by using the Conflict Tactics Scale. The study is based on a consecutive series of 55 married or cohabiting psychiatric in-patients treated at Huddinge Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden in 1994. The study shows that males and females use similar types of both violent and non-violent strategies when trying to solve marital conflicts. Depressed patients use both non-violent and violent methods less often than non-depressed patients, while the opposite is true for patients with a personality disorder, and for schizophrenics. Psychosocial stressors appear to be of limited importance in this context, while poor general functioning is associated with destructive ways of trying to solve conflicts between husband and wife. However, there have been no Scandinavian population-based studies to establish the frequency and type of violence used when trying to solve marital conflicts. Thus there is a need for such studies, and the present investigation supports the American experience that the Conflict Tactics Scale is a usable and easily administered instrument for population-based studies.
本研究的目的是通过使用冲突策略量表来分析一组精神科住院患者中家庭暴力(家庭内暴力)的频率和模式。该研究基于1994年在瑞典斯德哥尔摩胡丁厄医院接受治疗的55名已婚或同居精神科住院患者的连续系列。研究表明,男性和女性在试图解决婚姻冲突时使用相似类型的暴力和非暴力策略。抑郁症患者使用非暴力和暴力方法的频率低于非抑郁症患者,而人格障碍患者和精神分裂症患者则相反。在这种情况下,社会心理压力源似乎重要性有限,而总体功能较差与试图解决夫妻之间冲突的破坏性方式有关。然而,尚无斯堪的纳维亚基于人群的研究来确定在试图解决婚姻冲突时使用的暴力频率和类型。因此,需要进行此类研究,并且本调查支持美国的经验,即冲突策略量表是用于基于人群研究的可用且易于管理的工具。