• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕妇择期子宫肌瘤切除术。

Elective uterine myomectomy in pregnant women.

作者信息

Mollica G, Pittini L, Minganti E, Perri G, Pansini F

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1996;23(3):168-72.

PMID:8894327
Abstract

One hundred and six pregnant women with uterine myomas were admitted to a clinical protocol for operative or conservative management of myomas. The criteria for decision to submit to surgery were: (i) recurrent pain; (ii) large or rapidly growing myomas; (iii) large or medium myomas located in the lower uterine segment or deforming the placental site. According to these criteria 18 patients underwent myomectomy (operative group) and 88 were conservatively treated (conservative group). Complications and fetoneonatal outcome were monitored. The data were also compared to a control group of 2463 normal pregnant women. No spontaneous abortion occurred in the operated group, while the conservative group had a 13.6% spontaneous abortion rate (control group: 9.3%). The operated group had the highest cesarean section rate (93.7%), but no post-cesarean hysterectomy. The conservative group had a higher cesarean section rate compared with the pregnant women without myomas (34% vs 16.3%, respectively); they also had a 4.5% post-cesarean hysterectomy rate compared with 0.12% in the control group. Fetoneonatal outcome was good both in the conservative and operated group. The only perinatal death regarded a patient with a large myoma who refused surgery and went into premature labour at 32 weeks of gestation. Therefore, our study demonstrates that myomectomy during pregnancy is of advantage when performed early on selected patients.

摘要

106名患有子宫肌瘤的孕妇纳入了一项针对子宫肌瘤进行手术或保守治疗的临床方案。决定进行手术的标准为:(i)复发性疼痛;(ii)肌瘤大或生长迅速;(iii)位于子宫下段的大或中等肌瘤或使胎盘部位变形。根据这些标准,18例患者接受了肌瘤切除术(手术组),88例接受了保守治疗(保守治疗组)。对并发症和胎儿-新生儿结局进行了监测。数据还与2463名正常孕妇的对照组进行了比较。手术组未发生自然流产,而保守治疗组的自然流产率为13.6%(对照组:9.3%)。手术组的剖宫产率最高(93.7%),但无剖宫产术后子宫切除术。与无肌瘤的孕妇相比,保守治疗组的剖宫产率更高(分别为34%和16.3%);与对照组的0.12%相比,其剖宫产术后子宫切除率为4.5%。保守治疗组和手术组的胎儿-新生儿结局均良好。唯一的围产期死亡病例是一名患有大肌瘤的患者,她拒绝手术,在妊娠32周时早产。因此,我们的研究表明,妊娠早期对选定患者进行肌瘤切除术是有益的。

相似文献

1
Elective uterine myomectomy in pregnant women.孕妇择期子宫肌瘤切除术。
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1996;23(3):168-72.
2
[Morphologic pattern of uterine myomas enucleated at cesarean section].[剖宫产时剔除的子宫肌瘤的形态学模式]
Ginekol Pol. 2002 Apr;73(4):255-9.
3
Uterine myomectomy in pregnant women.孕妇子宫肌瘤切除术
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):116-9. doi: 10.1159/000053893.
4
Ultrasound diagnosis of uterine myomas and complications in pregnancy.子宫肌瘤的超声诊断及妊娠并发症
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):97-101.
5
Myomectomy during cesarean section: a safe procedure?剖宫产术中肌瘤切除术:一种安全的手术吗?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Dec;1092:408-13. doi: 10.1196/annals.1365.038.
6
Analysis of clinical, biological and obstetric factors influencing the decision to perform cesarean myomectomy.影响剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术决策的临床、生物学及产科因素分析
Ginekol Pol. 2015 Jan;86(1):40-5. doi: 10.17772/gp/1897.
7
Pregnancy-preserving myomectomy: preliminary report on a new surgical technique.保留妊娠的子宫肌瘤切除术:一种新手术技术的初步报告。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Sep;13(3):323-6. doi: 10.1080/13625180802075281.
8
Prognostic and reproductive outcomes in women who had uterine myomas removed during cesarean section and sutured using different techniques.剖宫产术中不同缝合技术剔除子宫肌瘤对患者预后及妊娠结局的影响。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02852-9.
9
Uterine artery ligation for treatment of pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas who are undergoing cesarean section.剖宫产术中子宫动脉结扎术治疗合并子宫平滑肌瘤的孕妇。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Aug;86(2):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.027. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
10
Intraoperative hemorrhage as a complication of cesarean myomectomy: analysis of risk factors.剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术中出血作为一种并发症:危险因素分析
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016 May;73(5):415-21. doi: 10.2298/vsp141105029s.

引用本文的文献

1
Antenatal myomectomy of huge pedunculated fibroid.产前子宫肌瘤切除术治疗巨大带蒂肌瘤。
BMJ Case Rep. 2024 Jan 24;17(1):e257980. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-257980.
2
Use of point-of-care ultrasound to diagnose spontaneous rupture of fibroid in pregnancy.床旁超声在诊断妊娠合并子宫肌瘤自发性破裂中的应用。
POCUS J. 2021 Apr 22;6(1):16-21. doi: 10.24908/pocus.v6i1.14757. eCollection 2021.
3
Do Large Uterine Fibroids Impact Pregnancy Outcomes?大的子宫肌瘤会影响妊娠结局吗?
Oman Med J. 2021 Jul 31;36(4):e292. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.93. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Uterine fibroids and risk of preterm birth by clinical subtypes: a prospective cohort study.子宫肌瘤与临床亚型早产风险的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03968-2.
5
Successful Myomectomy in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy.妊娠中期成功进行子宫肌瘤切除术。
Adv Biomed Res. 2019 Sep 30;8:60. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_236_18. eCollection 2019.
6
Leiomyomas in Pregnancy and Spontaneous Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.妊娠合并平滑肌瘤与自然流产:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):1065-1072. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002313.
7
Prospective Cohort Study of Uterine Fibroids and Miscarriage Risk.子宫肌瘤与流产风险的前瞻性队列研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 15;186(10):1140-1148. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx062.
8
Uterine Fibroid Torsion during Pregnancy: A Case of Laparotomic Myomectomy at 18 Weeks' Gestation with Systematic Review of the Literature.妊娠期间子宫肌瘤扭转:18周妊娠时剖腹子宫肌瘤切除术1例并文献系统综述
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2017;2017:4970802. doi: 10.1155/2017/4970802. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
9
Myomectomy at cesarean section: A safe option.剖宫产时行子宫肌瘤切除术:一种安全的选择。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Dec;72(Suppl 1):S161-S163. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 May 7.
10
Successful myomectomy in early pregnancy for a large asymptomatic uterine myoma: case report.早期妊娠时成功切除大型无症状子宫肌瘤:病例报告
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Jul 13;24:228. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.228.9890. eCollection 2016.