Bergman R N, Watanabe R, Rebrin K, Ader M, Steil G
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90033, USA.
Diabet Med. 1996 Sep;13(9 Suppl 6):S67-77.
The search for the genetic basis of NIDDM has magnified the need for an efficient representation of the pre-NIDDM phenotype. The overall goal is to relate specific mutations on the genome to specific changes in physiologic function which lead to NIDDM. Unfortunately, there is still not a clear understanding of the molecular cause of NIDDM in most individuals. Therefore, one must take an alternative approach: to express in quantitative terms the various tissue processes which determine the ability to regulate the blood glucose in fasting and after carbohydrate administration. A minimal list of such processes includes the provision of glucose by the liver, insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and glucose effectiveness. The latter function is the ability of glucose per se to enhance glucose disappearance from blood, independent of a dynamic insulin response. Approaches to measuring the list of functions which determine the glucose tolerance are reviewed: they include the minimal model method, which quantitates insulin sensitivity (Sl) and glucose effectiveness (SG), and a combined model approach, which measures insulin secretion. These methods are being developed for large populations. Such a development is important for elucidating the causes of reduced glucose tolerance in populations, and examining the relation between such causes and outcomes including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Of particular importance for diabetes development is the characteristic hyperbolic relationship between insulin secretion and insulin action. This relationship, the "hyperbolic law of glucose tolerance' indicates that insulin secretion can only be assessed in terms of the ambient degree of insulin sensitivity. By applying this principle, it is clear that latent pancreatic islet-cell dysfunction has been underestimated, and may be significant even in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Finally, new explorations of insulin control of liver glucose output indicate that this process may be under the control of free fatty acids. The latter realization indicates that the insulin effect on lipolysis is what is critical for determination of glucose output in the fasting state, and that insulin resistance at the level of the adipocyte may determine the extent of fasting hyperglycaemia, and may be an important factor in the overall phenotype in prediabetic and NIDDM individuals.
对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)遗传基础的研究,凸显了有效表征糖尿病前期表型的必要性。总体目标是将基因组上的特定突变与导致NIDDM的生理功能的特定变化联系起来。不幸的是,大多数个体中NIDDM的分子病因仍未明确。因此,必须采取另一种方法:以定量方式表达决定空腹及摄入碳水化合物后调节血糖能力的各种组织过程。此类过程的最简清单包括肝脏提供葡萄糖、胰岛素敏感性、胰岛素分泌以及葡萄糖效能。后者的功能是葡萄糖本身增强葡萄糖从血液中清除的能力,与动态胰岛素反应无关。本文综述了测量决定糖耐量的各项功能的方法:包括定量胰岛素敏感性(Sl)和葡萄糖效能(SG)的最小模型法,以及测量胰岛素分泌的联合模型法。这些方法正在针对大规模人群进行开发。这样的进展对于阐明人群中糖耐量降低的原因,以及研究这些原因与包括糖尿病和心血管疾病在内的后果之间的关系至关重要。对于糖尿病的发展而言,特别重要的是胰岛素分泌与胰岛素作用之间典型的双曲线关系。这种关系,即“糖耐量的双曲线定律”表明,胰岛素分泌只能根据胰岛素敏感性的环境程度来评估。应用这一原理可知,潜在的胰岛细胞功能障碍一直被低估,甚至在糖耐量受损的个体中也可能很显著。最后,对胰岛素控制肝脏葡萄糖输出的新探索表明,这一过程可能受游离脂肪酸的控制。这一认识表明,胰岛素对脂肪分解的作用对于空腹状态下葡萄糖输出的决定至关重要,脂肪细胞水平的胰岛素抵抗可能决定空腹高血糖的程度,并且可能是糖尿病前期和NIDDM个体整体表型中的一个重要因素。