Gijsen F J, Palmen D E, van der Beek M H, van de Vosse F N, van Dongen M E, Janssen J D
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
J Biomech. 1996 Nov;29(11):1483-9. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84544-1.
Laser Doppler anemometer (LDA) experiments were performed to gain quantitative information on the differences between the large-scale flow phenomena in a non-stenosed and a stenosed model of the carotid artery bifurcation. The influence of the presence of the stenosis was compared to the effect of flow pulse variation to evaluate the feasibility of early detection of stenosis in clinical practice. Three-dimensional Plexiglass models of a non-stenosed and a 25% stenosed carotid artery bifurcation were perfused with a Newtonian fluid. The flow conditions approximated physiological flow. The results of the velocity measurements in the non-stenosed model agreed with the results from previous hydrogen-bubble visualization. A shear layer separated the low-velocity area near the non-divider wall from the high-velocity area near the divider wall. In this shear layer, vortex formation occurred during the deceleration phase of the flow pulse. The instability of this shear layer dictated the flow disturbances. The influences of the mild stenosis, located at the non-divider wall, was mainly limited to the stability of the shear layer. No disturbances were found downstream of the stenosis near the non-divider wall. Using a pulse wave with an increased systolic deceleration time, the velocity distribution showed an extended region with reversed flow, a more pronounced shear layer and increased vortex strength. From these measurements it is obvious that the influence of the presence of a mild stenosis, mainly limited to the stability of the shear layer, can hardly be distinguished from the effects of a variation of the flow pulse. From this it can be concluded that methods for detection of mild stenosis, using solely the large-scale flow phenomena, as can be measured by ultrasound or MRI techniques, will hardly have any clinical relevance.
进行了激光多普勒风速仪(LDA)实验,以获取关于颈动脉分叉非狭窄模型和狭窄模型中大规模流动现象差异的定量信息。将狭窄存在的影响与流动脉冲变化的影响进行比较,以评估在临床实践中早期检测狭窄的可行性。用牛顿流体灌注非狭窄和25%狭窄的颈动脉分叉的三维有机玻璃模型。流动条件近似生理流动。非狭窄模型中的速度测量结果与先前氢气泡可视化的结果一致。一个剪切层将非分隔壁附近的低速区域与分隔壁附近的高速区域分开。在这个剪切层中,在流动脉冲的减速阶段会形成漩涡。这个剪切层的不稳定性决定了流动干扰。位于非分隔壁处的轻度狭窄的影响主要限于剪切层的稳定性。在非分隔壁附近的狭窄下游未发现干扰。使用收缩期减速时间增加的脉搏波时,速度分布显示出一个具有反向流动的扩展区域、一个更明显的剪切层和增加的漩涡强度。从这些测量中可以明显看出,轻度狭窄存在的影响主要限于剪切层的稳定性,很难与流动脉冲变化的影响区分开来。由此可以得出结论,仅使用大规模流动现象(如通过超声或MRI技术测量)来检测轻度狭窄的方法几乎没有任何临床意义。