Shapiro S
Slone Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, USA.
J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996 Oct;46:44-58; discussion 58-9.
In 1989 and 1990, 2 reports of a new disease labeled the eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome (EMS) and attributed to L-tryptophan (LT) were published. In subsequent studies a putative contaminant was implicated. In this review the following studies are considered: the initial 2 reports of the overall association, one report of an association between LT and eosinophilic fasciitis, and one report describing the scale of the apparent epidemic of LT induced EMS. Of the 2 initial studies, one included previously reported exposed cases, failed to rule out the possibility that early symptoms of EMS could have caused LT use rather than the reverse, and failed to adhere to the methods, as published. The 2nd study has not been published in a peer reviewed journal. The study of eosinophilic fasciitis was subject to information bias and misclassification of the timing of LT use. The apparent epidemic could have been an artefact of waxing and waning enthusiasm for reporting exposed cases to an EMS registry, corresponding with the timing and the amount of publicity given to the topic. The questionable validity of these studies considerably weakens the claim that LT or a contaminant caused EMS.
1989年和1990年,发表了2篇关于一种被标记为嗜酸性粒细胞增多性肌痛综合征(EMS)且归因于L-色氨酸(LT)的新疾病的报告。在随后的研究中,一种假定的污染物被牵连其中。在本综述中,考虑了以下研究:关于总体关联的最初2篇报告、一篇关于LT与嗜酸性筋膜炎之间关联的报告,以及一篇描述LT诱发EMS明显流行规模的报告。在最初的2项研究中,其中一项纳入了先前报告的暴露病例,未能排除EMS早期症状可能导致LT使用而非相反情况的可能性,并且未遵循已发表的方法。第二项研究尚未在同行评审期刊上发表。关于嗜酸性筋膜炎的研究存在信息偏倚以及LT使用时间的错误分类。明显的流行可能是向EMS登记处报告暴露病例的热情起伏的一种假象,这与该主题的宣传时间和程度相对应。这些研究可疑的有效性极大地削弱了LT或一种污染物导致EMS这一说法。