• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择的困境:哪种袖带用于准确测量血压?

The dilemma of choice: which bladder for accurate blood pressure measurement?

作者信息

O'Brien E

机构信息

Blood Pressure Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1996;85 Suppl 3:26-31.

PMID:8896296
Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on a century-old controversy relating to the error that may be introduced to blood pressure measurement by using a cuff with a bladder of inappropriate dimensions for the arm for which it is intended. The use of cuffs containing inappropriate bladders is a serious source of error which must inevitably lead to incorrect diagnosis in practice and erroneous conclusions in hypertension research. There is unequivocal evidence that either too narrow or too short a bladder (undercuffing) will cause overestimation of blood pressure and there is growing evidence that too wide or too long a bladder (overcuffing) may cause underestimation of blood pressure. Undercuffing has the effect in clinical practice of overdiagnosing hypertension and overcuffing leads to hypertensive subjects being diagnosed as normotensive. Either eventuality has serious implications for the epidemiology of hypertension and clinical practice. A detailed review of the literature permits a definitive statement on bladder dimensions for a given arm circumference and clearly indicates that substantial error is caused by the use of inappropriate cuffs. On the basis of this review and aware of the advances in cuff design, the features for an "Adult Cuff", which would be applicable to all adult arms, are proposed in this paper, and it is hoped that manufacturers may take up the challenge of producing such a cuff.

摘要

本文回顾了有关一个百年争议的文献,该争议涉及使用气囊尺寸与预期使用手臂不匹配的袖带进行血压测量时可能引入的误差。使用气囊不合适的袖带是一个严重的误差来源,在实际操作中必然会导致错误诊断,并在高血压研究中得出错误结论。有明确证据表明,气囊过窄或过短(袖带过小)会导致血压高估,且越来越多的证据表明,气囊过宽或过长(袖带过大)可能会导致血压低估。袖带过小在临床实践中会导致高血压的过度诊断,而袖带过大会导致高血压患者被诊断为血压正常。这两种情况对高血压流行病学和临床实践都有严重影响。对文献的详细回顾允许就给定臂围的气囊尺寸做出明确说明,并清楚地表明使用不合适的袖带会导致重大误差。基于此回顾并意识到袖带设计的进展,本文提出了适用于所有成年手臂的“成人袖带”的特征,希望制造商能够接受生产这种袖带的挑战。

相似文献

1
The dilemma of choice: which bladder for accurate blood pressure measurement?选择的困境:哪种袖带用于准确测量血压?
Z Kardiol. 1996;85 Suppl 3:26-31.
2
Review: a century of confusion; which bladder for accurate blood pressure measurement?综述:一个世纪的困惑;哪种血压计适合准确测量血压?
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10(9):565-72.
3
Inaccuracies introduced by single width blood pressure cuffs.单宽度血压袖带引起的不准确性。
Hypertens Res. 2011 Feb;34(2):209-11. doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.210. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
4
[Arterial blood pressure measurement--which cuff?].[动脉血压测量——用哪种袖带?]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1992 Oct 3;122(40):1491-6.
5
[Blood pressure measurements using three different cuff sizes].[使用三种不同袖带尺寸测量血压]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Aug 30;118(20):3112-5.
6
[Oversized patient arms: a problem with blood pressure measurements].[超大体型患者的手臂:血压测量中的一个问题]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(5):389-93.
7
Loose cuff hypertension.袖带松弛性高血压
Cardiovasc Eng. 2009 Sep;9(3):113-8. doi: 10.1007/s10558-009-9077-0. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
8
Cuff bladder width and blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年袖带气囊宽度与血压测量
J Hypertens. 1992 Oct;10(10):1235-41.
9
[Oversized patient arms: a problem with blood pressure measurements in the ENT-practice].[超大体型患者的手臂:耳鼻喉科诊所中血压测量的一个问题]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2006 Nov;85(11):794-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-954445.
10
US demographic trends in mid-arm circumference and recommended blood pressure cuffs for children and adolescents: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-2004.美国儿童和青少年的上臂围人口统计学趋势及推荐使用的血压袖带:来自1988 - 2004年国家健康和营养检查调查的数据
Blood Press Monit. 2007 Apr;12(2):75-80. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280b08342.