Gershon R Y
Department of Obstetric Anesthesiology, Grady Health System, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA.
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Oct;43(10):1068-71. doi: 10.1007/BF03011912.
This case report describes a radiologically proven subdural catheter placed in a term parturient, which consistently performed as an epidural catheter for both labour analgesia as well as surgical anaesthesia.
The patient was a 26-yr-old, 52.7 kg. 140 cm healthy woman with a 39 wk intrauterine pregnancy. At initiation of epidural blockade, and for many hours throughout labour, an appropriate volume and concentration of local anaesthetic achieved an appropriate analgesic sensory level (10 ml bupivacaine 0.25%, bilateral T10 sensory level). However, for Caesarean section, while an appropriate volume and concentration of local anaesthetic achieved an appropriate surgical anaesthetic sensory level (15 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, bilateral T4 sensory level), there was no demonstrable motor blockade (0 on the Bromage scale). The Caesarean section was performed without incident, and without the need for supplemental intravenous opioids or anxiolytics.
We report the case to question the commonly held beliefs of subdural catheter presentation. We questioned the catheter position, and proved its subdural placement, only after larger volumes of higher concentration local anaesthetic did not achieve expected goals. It is possible that a high percentage of epidural catheters may be subdural, unbeknownst to the practitioner.
本病例报告描述了一例经放射学证实的硬膜下导管用于足月产妇,该导管在分娩镇痛及手术麻醉中均持续发挥硬膜外导管的作用。
患者为一名26岁、体重52.7千克、身高140厘米的健康女性,孕39周。在硬膜外阻滞开始时以及整个分娩过程中的多个小时里,适量的局部麻醉药容量和浓度达到了合适的镇痛感觉平面(10毫升0.25%布比卡因,双侧T10感觉平面)。然而,在剖宫产时,虽然适量的局部麻醉药容量和浓度达到了合适的手术麻醉感觉平面(15毫升0.5%布比卡因,双侧T4感觉平面),但未出现明显的运动阻滞( Bromage评分0分)。剖宫产手术顺利进行,无需补充静脉用阿片类药物或抗焦虑药。
我们报告该病例以质疑关于硬膜下导管表现的普遍观点。我们在较大容量的高浓度局部麻醉药未达到预期目标后才对导管位置提出质疑,并证实其为硬膜下置管。有可能很大比例的硬膜外导管实际上是硬膜下导管,而从业者并不知晓。