Cook-Mozaffari P
CRC, Cancer Epidemiology Research Group, Oxford, UK.
Community Dent Health. 1996 Sep;13 Suppl 2:56-62.
Early geographical studies of cancer in areas that have naturally-occurring fluoride at different levels gave no indication of an effect on cancer rates associated with higher intakes of fluoride. Following widespread fluoridation to improve dental health in the United States and Britain, non-epidemiologists presented analyses of cancer data which they claimed demonstrated such an effect. However, subsequent large-scale comparisons of cancer rates in fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas for successive periods following fluoridation have not indicated any increase, either for all cancer or for malignancies across the range of individual sites. Studies undertaken specifically to examine the claims of the non-epidemiologists have, time-and-again, shown that, with the use of accurate data and correct statistical methods, the purported effects cease to be apparent. Details of the earlier evidence and claims are given in the 'Report of a Working Party on the Fluoridation of Water and Cancer' by Professor George Knox (1985) and of more recent analyses in Hoover et al. (1991a; 1991b; unpublished internal US PHS Memo, 1993). The present paper gives a brief overview of the evidence that fluoride in drinking water has not been shown to cause an increase in the risk of developing cancer and of the errors in the analyses that purport to show such an increase.
早期对不同氟含量自然分布地区癌症情况的地理研究并未显示出氟摄入量增加与癌症发病率之间存在关联。在美国和英国广泛推行氟化措施以改善牙齿健康之后,非流行病学家对癌症数据进行了分析,称证明了存在这种关联。然而,随后对氟化地区和非氟化地区在氟化之后连续时间段内癌症发病率的大规模比较并未显示出任何增加,无论是所有癌症还是各个部位的恶性肿瘤。专门针对非流行病学家的说法进行的研究一次又一次地表明,使用准确的数据和正确的统计方法后,所谓的影响就不再明显。早期证据和说法的详细内容见乔治·诺克斯教授(1985年)的《水氟化与癌症问题工作小组报告》,以及胡佛等人(1991a;1991b;美国公共卫生署未发表的内部备忘录,1993年)的最新分析。本文简要概述了关于饮用水中的氟未被证明会增加患癌风险的证据,以及那些声称显示出这种增加的分析中存在的错误。