Ward J B, Ammenheuser M M, Whorton E B, Bechtold W E, Kelsey K T, Legator M S
Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-1147, USA.
Toxicology. 1996 Oct 28;113(1-3):84-90. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(96)03431-2.
The use of biological markers in the evaluation of human exposure to hazardous agents has increased rapidly in recent years. Because 1,3-butadiene is a mutagenic carcinogen, existing occupational levels of exposure may be appropriately evaluated using somatic cell mutation as a biomarker. Previously, we have described a biomarker study of workers in a butadiene monomer plant (Ward et al., 1994). We now report results from a second study of the same group of workers, conducted after plant modernization, and present preliminary results from a study of exposures in a styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) plant. Air levels of butadiene were determined using either charcoal tubes with air pumps or passive badge dosimeters. The quantity of a butadiene metabolite in the urine was used as a biomarker of exposure and the mutagenic effects of exposure were measured using the autoradiographic hprt mutant lymphocyte assay. In all three studies, the frequencies of hprt mutants were significantly elevated in workers from the areas of highest exposure when compared to workers from lower exposure areas or non-exposed subjects. The concentration of the urinary metabolite was significantly increased in high-exposed workers in the first study of monomer plant workers but not in the second. In the first monomer plant study, historical air concentrations of butadiene were higher in the production units than in the central control unit. While concurrent determined air concentrations were not elevated in the second monomer plant study, they were elevated in high exposure areas in the SBR plant study. Mutant frequencies in the lower-exposure and the non-exposed groups were consistent with historical values for non-smoking individuals who were not exposed to known mutagens. The use of biomarkers, including the hprt mutant lymphocyte assay, may be of great value in determining an appropriate occupational exposure limit for butadiene.
近年来,生物标志物在评估人类接触有害物质方面的应用迅速增加。由于1,3 - 丁二烯是一种诱变致癌物,可使用体细胞突变作为生物标志物来适当评估现有的职业接触水平。此前,我们描述了一项针对丁二烯单体工厂工人的生物标志物研究(Ward等人,1994年)。我们现在报告对同一组工人在工厂现代化改造后进行的第二项研究结果,并展示一项关于丁苯橡胶(SBR)工厂接触情况研究的初步结果。丁二烯的空气水平通过带气泵的活性炭管或被动式徽章剂量计来测定。尿中丁二烯代谢物的量被用作接触生物标志物,并且使用放射自显影hprt突变淋巴细胞测定法来测量接触的诱变效应。在所有三项研究中,与低接触区域的工人或未接触的受试者相比,高接触区域工人的hprt突变频率显著升高。在第一项单体工厂工人研究中,高接触工人尿代谢物浓度显著增加,但在第二项研究中未出现这种情况。在第一项单体工厂研究中,生产单元中丁二烯的历史空气浓度高于中央控制单元。虽然在第二项单体工厂研究中同时测定的空气浓度未升高,但在SBR工厂研究的高接触区域中空气浓度升高。低接触组和未接触组的突变频率与未接触已知诱变剂的非吸烟个体的历史值一致。使用包括hprt突变淋巴细胞测定法在内的生物标志物,可能在确定丁二烯的适当职业接触限值方面具有重要价值。