Neal R D, Heywood P L, Morley S
Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, UK.
Fam Pract. 1996 Oct;13(5):455-61. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.5.455.
We aimed to retrieve data on consultations from general practice databases and to develop and use appropriate methods of validation for these data.
MIQUEST software was used to retrieve the data from four practices. The data were validated by comparing them with figures generated by practice-based searches, measuring the uptake of recording of consultations over time, and comparing records of consultations in the case notes with those on the practice computers.
The required data were retrieved from general practice databases, but the path to success was difficult, and typified by uncertainty and unpredictability. The recording of consultations on the computers of four practices was more complete than the recording in the paper case records. There was a time period in the early months of computer use when the recording of consultations was less complete. There were differences in the completeness of recording consultations between practices, doctors, and patients.
This study confirms the potential of general practice databases for research, demonstrates how MIQUEST software can be a useful tool in retrieving data from general practice databases, and indicates how the completeness of data recording permitted further analysis for the purposes of our study.
我们旨在从全科医疗数据库中检索会诊数据,并开发和使用适用于这些数据的验证方法。
使用MIQUEST软件从四家医疗机构检索数据。通过将这些数据与基于医疗机构搜索生成的数据进行比较、衡量随时间推移会诊记录的录入情况,以及将病历中的会诊记录与医疗机构计算机上的记录进行比较,来验证这些数据。
从全科医疗数据库中检索到了所需数据,但成功之路艰难,其特点是存在不确定性和不可预测性。四家医疗机构计算机上的会诊记录比纸质病历中的记录更完整。在计算机使用的最初几个月里,会诊记录存在一段时间不太完整的情况。不同医疗机构、医生和患者之间,会诊记录的完整程度存在差异。
本研究证实了全科医疗数据库在研究方面的潜力,展示了MIQUEST软件如何能成为从全科医疗数据库检索数据的有用工具,并指出了数据记录的完整性如何为我们的研究目的允许进一步分析。