Suppr超能文献

相较于最大缩短,对亚最大肌肉拉长的初始适应性更强。

Greater initial adaptations to submaximal muscle lengthening than maximal shortening.

作者信息

Hortobágyi T, Barrier J, Beard D, Braspennincx J, Koens P, Devita P, Dempsey L, Lambert J

机构信息

Biomechanics Laboratory, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Oct;81(4):1677-82. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.4.1677.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term strength and neural adaptations to eccentric and concentric training at equal force levels. Forty-two sedentary women (age = 21.5 yr) were ranked based on the initial quadriceps strength score, and trios of subjects were randomly assigned to either an eccentric (n = 14), a concentric (n = 14), or a nonexercising control group (n = 14). Training involved a total of 824 eccentric or concentric quadriceps actions at 1.05 rad.s-1 administered in four sets of 6-10 repetitions, four times per week for 6 wk. Before and after training, all subjects were tested for unilateral maximal isometric and eccentric and concentric actions at 1.05 rad.s-1 and for a 40-repetition eccentric and concentric fatigue series of the left and right quadriceps. Surface electromyographic activity of the vastus lateralis and medialis was monitored during testing. Concentric training increased concentric (36%, P < 0.05), isometric (18%, P < 0.05), and eccentric strength (13%), and eccentric training increased eccentric (42%, P < 0.05), isometric (30%, P < 0.05), and concentric (13%) strength. Eccentric training improved eccentric and isometric strength more (P < 0.05) than did concentric training. The electromyographic adaptations were greater with eccentric training. Cross-education was 6%, and neither training mode modified fatigability. The data suggest that training of the quadriceps muscle with submaximal eccentric actions brings about greater strength adaptations faster than does training with maximal-level concentric actions in women. This greater adaptation is likely to be mediated by both mechanical and neural factors.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在同等力量水平下,离心训练和向心训练的短期力量及神经适应性。根据初始股四头肌力量得分对42名久坐不动的女性(年龄=21.5岁)进行排名,将受试者三人一组随机分配至离心训练组(n=14)、向心训练组(n=14)或非运动对照组(n=14)。训练包括以1.05弧度·秒-1进行总共824次股四头肌离心或向心动作,分四组,每组6-10次重复,每周进行4次,共6周。在训练前后,对所有受试者进行测试,包括以1.05弧度·秒-1进行单侧最大等长、离心和向心动作,以及对左右股四头肌进行40次重复的离心和向心疲劳系列测试。在测试过程中监测股外侧肌和股内侧肌的表面肌电活动。向心训练增加了向心力量(36%,P<0.05)、等长力量(18%,P<0.05)和离心力量(13%),离心训练增加了离心力量(42%,P<0.05)、等长力量(30%,P<0.05)和向心力量(13%)。离心训练比向心训练更能提高离心和等长力量(P<0.05)。离心训练的肌电适应性更大。交叉训练效果为6%,两种训练方式均未改变疲劳性。数据表明,在女性中,以次最大离心动作训练股四头肌比以最大水平向心动作训练能更快带来更大的力量适应性。这种更大的适应性可能由机械因素和神经因素共同介导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验