Vedhara K, Nott K
Department of Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff.
J Behav Med. 1996 Oct;19(5):467-78. doi: 10.1007/BF01857679.
Sixteen final-year students and 14 nonstudents were recruited into a pilot study exploring the utility of the Merieux Multitest CMI in identifying stress-related immune impairment. The results of the investigation revealed that the examination group reported greater stress than the nonexamination group. The relationship between stress and immune impairment was explored using two widely held definitions of stress (i.e., stimulus and response). When stress was defined as the stimulus (i.e., examination versus nonexamination groups), reactions to the skin test were not significantly different. However, when stress was defined as the response (i.e., high stress versus low stress scores), the high-stress individuals were found to have poorer reactions to the skin test than the low-stress subjects. The results of the study highlight the need for greater precision in the definition of the term stress and, also, suggest that Multitest CMI can provide a rapid and reproducible means of assessing stress-related immune dysfunction.
16名即将毕业的学生和14名非学生被招募进一项探索梅里埃多种检测CMI在识别压力相关免疫损伤方面效用的试点研究。调查结果显示,考试组报告的压力比非考试组更大。使用两种广泛认可的压力定义(即刺激和反应)来探讨压力与免疫损伤之间的关系。当压力被定义为刺激时(即考试组与非考试组),对皮肤测试的反应没有显著差异。然而,当压力被定义为反应时(即高压力分数与低压力分数),发现高压力个体对皮肤测试的反应比低压力受试者更差。该研究结果强调了在压力术语定义上需要更高的精确性,并且还表明多种检测CMI可以提供一种快速且可重复的评估压力相关免疫功能障碍的方法。