Malec J F
Mayo Medical Center and Medical School, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Brain Inj. 1996 Nov;10(11):781-95. doi: 10.1080/026990596123909.
An ethics of relationships for brain injury (BI) rehabilitation is described based on three principles; (1) human relationships are important; (2) human relationships are as important as individual survival; (3) human relationships are important enough to extend throughout the family of humankind. Within the context of this ethics of relationships, ethical conflict resolution (ECR) is offered as a process to address disagreements among those involved in BI rehabilitation. ECR provides a means to arrive at moral decisions in situations in which people disagree about the appropriate course of action because of differing values. ECR recognizes that, although disagreements in BI rehabilitation settings can be associated with multiple other factors, including disturbed self-awareness, emotions, communication, and interpersonal dynamics, such disagreements may also be value-based, either in whole or part. ECR invites the professional team to identify the value-based portion of these disagreements and provides a rational and supportive process to address disagreements. In this discussion of ECR, common and potentially universal areas of ethical concern in BI rehabilitation are identified, as well as potential risks. Specific examples of the application of ECR in cases of vegetative state, coma stimulation, and cognitive rehabilitation are described.
本文基于三项原则阐述了脑损伤(BI)康复中的关系伦理:(1)人际关系很重要;(2)人际关系与个体生存同等重要;(3)人际关系至关重要,应扩展至整个人类大家庭。在这种关系伦理的背景下,提出了伦理冲突解决(ECR)方法,作为处理BI康复相关各方分歧的过程。ECR提供了一种手段,以便在人们因价值观不同而对适当行动方案存在分歧的情况下做出道德决策。ECR认识到,尽管BI康复环境中的分歧可能与多种其他因素相关,包括自我意识紊乱、情绪、沟通和人际动态,但此类分歧也可能全部或部分基于价值观。ECR促使专业团队识别这些分歧中基于价值观的部分,并提供一个合理且支持性的过程来处理分歧。在关于ECR的讨论中,确定了BI康复中常见且可能具有普遍性的伦理关注领域以及潜在风险。描述了ECR在植物状态、昏迷促醒和认知康复案例中的具体应用实例。