de Bakker I P, Everaerd W
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. kp
Maturitas. 1996 Oct;25(2):87-98. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(96)01046-8.
Specificity and sensitivity of two physiological markers for hot flushes were investigated. One marker, proposed by Freedman, is an increase of sternal skin conductance, the second marker, proposed by Swartzman, is a physiological profile which consists of skin conductance changes in combination with circulation changes. In our laboratory 20 menopausal women, 15 with frequent hot flushes and 5 without hot flushes, and 5 women with regular menstrual cycles were continuously monitored for 2.5 h on subjective hot flush experience, sternal and palmar skin conductance, dorsal and palmar finger temperature and pulse blood volume. Increase in sternal skin conductance proved to be very specific in contrast to Swartzman's physiological profile, although it was less sensitive. Receiver operating characteristics revealed that an increase combined with a preceding decrease in sternal skin conductance as most specific for, and most sensitive to, subjectively reported hot flushes. This was confirmed by a cross-validation with 34 "flushing' menopausal women.
对潮热的两种生理指标的特异性和敏感性进行了研究。一种指标由弗里德曼提出,是胸骨皮肤电导率增加;第二种指标由斯瓦茨曼提出,是一种生理特征,包括皮肤电导率变化与循环变化相结合。在我们实验室,对20名绝经后女性(15名有频繁潮热,5名无潮热)和5名月经周期正常的女性进行了2.5小时的连续监测,内容包括主观潮热体验、胸骨和手掌皮肤电导率、手背和手掌手指温度以及脉搏血容量。与斯瓦茨曼的生理特征相比,胸骨皮肤电导率增加被证明具有很高的特异性,尽管其敏感性较低。受试者工作特征曲线显示,胸骨皮肤电导率先下降后增加对主观报告的潮热最为特异且最为敏感。这一点在对34名“潮热”绝经后女性的交叉验证中得到了证实。