Hanyu F, Azuma T, Yoshikawa T
Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1996 Aug;97(8):626-30.
A total of 141 cases of congenital bile duct dilatation (excluding those with cancer) were treated at the Department of gastroenterological Surgery of Tokyo Women's Medical College in the past 27 years. The lesion was morphologically classified as Todani type I in 93 patients, type II in 1, type III in 2, type IV-A in 42, and type V or multiple dilatation of the peripheral bile ducts in 3. Cholangiectasis was accompanied by intrahepatic stones in 1 type I patient, 18 type IVA patients, and 2 type V patients. None of type II and type III patients had intrahepatic stones. Of the 21 patients with intrahepatic stones, only 2 (both type IVA) had no history of surgery. In these patients, a common bile duct stone was considered to be the cause of intrahepatic stone formation. Nineteen patients had undergone surgery, comprising cholecystectomy in 2 type V patients, bypass surgery in 5 type IVA patients, and excision of the extrahepatic bile ducts with biliary tract reconstruction in 1 type I and 11 type IVA patients. Of the 12 patients who underwent excision of the extrahepatic bile ducts with biliary tract reconstruction, intrahepatic stone formation was considered to be ascribable to stenosis at the choledocho-jejunostomy site in 3 and to insufficient excision of the extrahepatic bile ducts in 4. Therefore, when performing excision of the extrahepatic bile ducts and biliary tract reconstruction in patients with congenital cholangiectasis, we now take care to achieve thorough excision of the extrahepatic bile ducts and not leave any stenotic region in the porta hepatis. For choledocho-jejunostomy, we join the left and right hepatic ducts as necessary or incise the hepatic duct axialy so as to make the anastomotic orifice large enough. In the 5 remaining patients, intrahepatic stone formation was considered to be due to persistence of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation or stenosis, although there were no technical problem with excision of the extrahepatic ducts and biliary tract reconstruction. In 4 of the 5 patients, partial hepatectomy was performed to remove the intrahepatic stones, but new stones formed again in 2 of them. When intrahepatic bile duct dilatation or stenosis is localized at the periphery of lobule, hepatectomy is indicated. However, when intrahepatic bile duct dilatation or stenosis is extensive in both lobes, no curative technique is available and bile duct dilatation or stenosis wil persist in the liver after surgery. In such cases, the disease may become further complicated by cholangitis and intrahepatic stone formation, making it very difficult to control. Therefore, patients with extensive intrahepatic bile duct dilatation or stenosis should be monitored very carefully even after surgery.
在过去27年中,东京女子医科大学胃肠外科共治疗了141例先天性胆管扩张症患者(不包括合并癌症者)。病变形态学上,93例为Todani I型,1例为II型,2例为III型,42例为IV - A型,3例为V型或肝外胆管多发扩张。胆管扩张症合并肝内结石的情况为:1例I型患者、18例IV - A型患者和2例V型患者。II型和III型患者均无肝内结石。在21例肝内结石患者中,仅2例(均为IV - A型)无手术史。在这些患者中,胆总管结石被认为是肝内结石形成的原因。19例患者接受了手术,其中2例V型患者行胆囊切除术,5例IV - A型患者行旁路手术,1例I型和11例IV - A型患者行肝外胆管切除并胆道重建。在12例行肝外胆管切除并胆道重建的患者中,3例肝内结石形成被认为归因于胆总管空肠吻合口狭窄,4例归因于肝外胆管切除不彻底。因此,在对先天性胆管扩张症患者进行肝外胆管切除并胆道重建时,我们现在注意彻底切除肝外胆管,不在肝门处留下任何狭窄区域。对于胆总管空肠吻合术,我们根据需要连接左右肝管或沿肝管轴向切开,以使吻合口足够大。在其余5例患者中,尽管肝外胆管切除和胆道重建没有技术问题,但肝内结石形成被认为是由于肝内胆管扩张或狭窄持续存在。在这5例患者中的4例,进行了部分肝切除术以清除肝内结石,但其中2例又形成了新的结石。当肝内胆管扩张或狭窄局限于小叶周边时,应行肝切除术。然而,当肝内胆管扩张或狭窄在两叶均广泛存在时,没有治愈性技术,术后肝脏内胆管扩张或狭窄仍会持续。在这种情况下,疾病可能因胆管炎和肝内结石形成而进一步复杂化,难以控制。因此,即使在术后,对肝内胆管扩张或狭窄广泛的患者也应非常仔细地进行监测。