Bamshad M, Fraley A E, Crawford M H, Cann R L, Busi B R, Naidu J M, Jorde L B
Department of Pediatrics, Health Sciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84132, USA.
Hum Biol. 1996 Feb;68(1):1-28.
Various anthropological analyses have documented extensive regional variation among populations on the subcontinent of India using morphological, protein, blood group, and nuclear DNA polymorphisms. These patterns are the product of complex population structure (genetic drift, gene flow) and a population history noted for numerous branching events. As a result, the interpretation of relationships among caste populations of South India and between Indians and continental populations remains controversial. The Hindu caste system is a general model of genetic differentiation among endogamous populations stratified by social forces (e.g., religion and occupation). The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecule has unique properties that facilitate the exploration of population structure. We analyzed 36 Hindu men born in Andhra Pradesh who were unrelated matrilineally through at least 3 generations and who represent 4 caste populations: Brahmin (9), Yadava (10), Kapu (7), and Relli (10). Individuals from Africa (36), Asia (36), and Europe (36) were sampled for comparison. A 200-base-pair segment of hypervariable segment 2 (HVS2) of the mtDNA control region was sequenced in all individuals. In the Indian castes 25 distinct haplotypes are identified. Aside from the Cambridge reference sequence, only two haplotypes are shared between caste populations. Middle castes form a highly supported cluster in a neighbor-joining network. Mean nucleotide diversity within each caste is 0.015, 0.012, 0.011, and 0.012 for the Brahmin, Yadava, Kapu, and Relli, respectively. mtDNA variation is highly structured between castes (GST = 0.17; p < 0.002). The effects of social structure on mtDNA variation are much greater than those on variation measured by traditional markers. Explanations for this discordance include (1) the higher resolving power of mtDNA, (2) sex-dependent gene flow, (3) differences in male and female effective population sizes, and (4) elements of the kinship structure. Thirty distinct haplotypes are found in Africans, 17 in Asians, and 13 in Europeans. Mean nucleotide diversity is 0.019, 0.014, 0.009, and 0.007 for Africans, Indians, Asians, and Europeans, respectively. These populations are highly structured geographically (GST = 0.15; p < 0.001). The caste populations of Andhra Pradesh cluster more often with Africans than with Asians or Europeans. This is suggestive of admixture with African populations.
各种人类学分析通过形态学、蛋白质、血型和核DNA多态性记录了印度次大陆人群之间广泛的区域差异。这些模式是复杂种群结构(遗传漂变、基因流动)以及以众多分支事件为特征的种群历史的产物。因此,对南印度种姓人群之间以及印度人与大陆人群之间关系的解读仍存在争议。印度教种姓制度是由社会力量(如宗教和职业)分层的内婚制人群之间遗传分化的一般模式。线粒体DNA(mtDNA)分子具有独特的特性,便于探索种群结构。我们分析了36名出生在安得拉邦的印度教男性,他们至少三代母系无血缘关系,代表4个种姓人群:婆罗门(9人)、雅达瓦(10人)、卡普(7人)和雷利(10人)。抽取了来自非洲(36人)、亚洲(36人)和欧洲(36人)的个体作为对照。对所有个体的mtDNA控制区高变区2(HVS2)的一段200个碱基对的片段进行了测序。在印度种姓人群中鉴定出25种不同的单倍型。除了剑桥参考序列外,种姓人群之间仅共享两种单倍型。在邻接网络中,中等种姓形成了一个高度支持的聚类。婆罗门、雅达瓦、卡普和雷利每个种姓内的平均核苷酸多样性分别为0.015、0.012、0.011和0.012。种姓之间的mtDNA变异具有高度的结构化(GST = 0.17;p < 0.002)。社会结构对mtDNA变异的影响远大于对传统标记所测变异的影响。这种不一致的解释包括:(1)mtDNA的分辨能力更高;(2)性别依赖性基因流动;(3)男性和女性有效种群大小的差异;(4)亲属结构因素。在非洲人中发现了30种不同的单倍型,亚洲人中有17种,欧洲人中有13种。非洲人、印度人、亚洲人和欧洲人的平均核苷酸多样性分别为0.019、0.014、0.009和0.007。这些人群在地理上具有高度的结构化(GST = 0.15;p < 0.001)。安得拉邦的种姓人群与非洲人聚类的频率高于与亚洲人或欧洲人。这表明与非洲人群存在混合。