Bamshad M, Kivisild T, Watkins W S, Dixon M E, Ricker C E, Rao B B, Naidu J M, Prasad B V, Reddy P G, Rasanayagam A, Papiha S S, Villems R, Redd A J, Hammer M F, Nguyen S V, Carroll M L, Batzer M A, Jorde L B
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Genome Res. 2001 Jun;11(6):994-1004. doi: 10.1101/gr.gr-1733rr.
The origins and affinities of the approximately 1 billion people living on the subcontinent of India have long been contested. This is owing, in part, to the many different waves of immigrants that have influenced the genetic structure of India. In the most recent of these waves, Indo-European-speaking people from West Eurasia entered India from the Northwest and diffused throughout the subcontinent. They purportedly admixed with or displaced indigenous Dravidic-speaking populations. Subsequently they may have established the Hindu caste system and placed themselves primarily in castes of higher rank. To explore the impact of West Eurasians on contemporary Indian caste populations, we compared mtDNA (400 bp of hypervariable region 1 and 14 restriction site polymorphisms) and Y-chromosome (20 biallelic polymorphisms and 5 short tandem repeats) variation in approximately 265 males from eight castes of different rank to approximately 750 Africans, Asians, Europeans, and other Indians. For maternally inherited mtDNA, each caste is most similar to Asians. However, 20%-30% of Indian mtDNA haplotypes belong to West Eurasian haplogroups, and the frequency of these haplotypes is proportional to caste rank, the highest frequency of West Eurasian haplotypes being found in the upper castes. In contrast, for paternally inherited Y-chromosome variation each caste is more similar to Europeans than to Asians. Moreover, the affinity to Europeans is proportionate to caste rank, the upper castes being most similar to Europeans, particularly East Europeans. These findings are consistent with greater West Eurasian male admixture with castes of higher rank. Nevertheless, the mitochondrial genome and the Y chromosome each represents only a single haploid locus and is more susceptible to large stochastic variation, bottlenecks, and selective sweeps. Thus, to increase the power of our analysis, we assayed 40 independent, biparentally inherited autosomal loci (1 LINE-1 and 39 Alu elements) in all of the caste and continental populations (approximately 600 individuals). Analysis of these data demonstrated that the upper castes have a higher affinity to Europeans than to Asians, and the upper castes are significantly more similar to Europeans than are the lower castes. Collectively, all five datasets show a trend toward upper castes being more similar to Europeans, whereas lower castes are more similar to Asians. We conclude that Indian castes are most likely to be of proto-Asian origin with West Eurasian admixture resulting in rank-related and sex-specific differences in the genetic affinities of castes to Asians and Europeans.
长期以来,生活在印度次大陆上的约10亿人口的起源和种族关系一直存在争议。部分原因在于,众多不同的移民浪潮影响了印度的基因结构。在这些浪潮中,最近一次是来自西亚的印欧语系人群从西北部进入印度,并扩散至整个次大陆。据说他们与说达罗毗荼语的本土人群混合或取代了他们。随后,他们可能建立了印度教种姓制度,并主要将自己置于较高等级的种姓中。为了探究西亚人对当代印度种姓人群的影响,我们比较了来自八个不同等级种姓的约265名男性以及约750名非洲人、亚洲人、欧洲人和其他印度人的线粒体DNA(高变区1的400个碱基对和14个限制性位点多态性)和Y染色体(20个双等位基因多态性和5个短串联重复序列)的变异情况。对于母系遗传的线粒体DNA,每个种姓与亚洲人最为相似。然而,20% - 30%的印度线粒体DNA单倍型属于西亚单倍群,这些单倍型的频率与种姓等级成正比,在高种姓中发现的西亚单倍型频率最高。相比之下,对于父系遗传的Y染色体变异,每个种姓与欧洲人比与亚洲人更为相似。此外,与欧洲人的相似程度与种姓等级成正比,高种姓与欧洲人最为相似,尤其是东欧人。这些发现与西亚男性与较高等级种姓有更多混合的情况一致。然而,线粒体基因组和Y染色体各自仅代表一个单倍体位点,更容易受到大的随机变异、瓶颈效应和选择性清除的影响。因此,为了提高我们分析的效力,我们在所有种姓和大陆人群(约600人)中检测了40个独立的、双亲遗传的常染色体位点(1个LINE - 1和39个Alu元件)。对这些数据的分析表明,高种姓与欧洲人比与亚洲人有更高的相似性,且高种姓与欧洲人的相似程度明显高于低种姓。总体而言,所有五个数据集都显示出一种趋势,即高种姓与欧洲人更相似,而低种姓与亚洲人更相似。我们得出结论,印度种姓很可能起源于原生亚洲人,西亚人的混合导致了种姓在与亚洲人和欧洲人的基因相似性上出现与等级相关且性别特异性的差异。