Bauchner H, Vinci R, Bak S, Pearson C, Corwin M J
Division of General Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center (formerly Boston City Hospital), MA 02118, USA.
Pediatrics. 1996 Nov;98(5):861-7.
Previous work has shown that parents prefer to be present when their children undergo common invasive procedures, although physicians are ambivalent about parental presence.
To determine the effect of a parent-focused intervention on the pain and performance of the procedure, anxiety of parents and clinicians, and parental satisfaction with care.
Children younger than 3 years old undergoing venipuncture, intravenous cannulation, or uretheral catheterization.
Pediatric emergency department of Boston City Hospital.
Randomized controlled trial with three groups; parents present and given instructions on how to help their children; parents present, but no instructions given; and parents not present.
The parents were instructed to touch, talk to, and maintain eye contact during the procedure.
A total of 431 parents was randomized to the intervention (N = 153), present (N = 147), and not present (N = 131) groups. The groups were equivalent with respect to measured sociodemographic variables and parents' previous experience in the pediatric emergency department. No differences emerged with respect to pain (3-point scale measured by parent and clinician, and analysis of cry); performance of the procedure (number of attempts, completion of procedure by first clinician, time); clinician anxiety; or parental satisfaction with care. Parents who were present were more likely to rate the pain of the children as extreme/severe (52%) in comparison to clinicians (15%, kappa .07, poor agreement) and were significantly less anxious than parents who were not present.
Overall, the intervention was not effective in reducing the pain of routine procedures. Parental presence did not negatively affect performance of the procedure or increase clinician anxiety. Parents who were present were less anxious than those who were not present.
In general, parents have indicated that they want to be present when their children undergo procedures. The results of this study challenge the traditional belief that parental presence negatively affects our ability to successfully complete procedures. We should encourage parents who want to be present to stay during procedures.
先前的研究表明,尽管医生对家长在场持矛盾态度,但孩子接受常见侵入性操作时,家长更愿意在场。
确定以家长为重点的干预措施对操作时的疼痛和表现、家长及临床医生的焦虑以及家长对护理的满意度的影响。
3岁以下接受静脉穿刺、静脉插管或尿道插管的儿童。
波士顿市医院儿科急诊科。
三组随机对照试验;家长在场并接受如何帮助孩子的指导;家长在场,但未给予指导;家长不在场。
指导家长在操作过程中触摸、与孩子交谈并保持眼神交流。
共有431名家长被随机分为干预组(N = 153)、在场组(N = 147)和不在场组(N = 131)。在测量的社会人口统计学变量以及家长先前在儿科急诊科的经历方面,各组相当。在疼痛(家长和临床医生用3分制测量以及哭声分析)、操作表现(尝试次数、首位临床医生完成操作情况、时间)、临床医生焦虑或家长对护理的满意度方面,未发现差异。与临床医生(15%)相比,在场的家长更有可能将孩子的疼痛评为极度/严重(52%)(kappa值为0.07,一致性差),且比不在场的家长焦虑程度明显更低。
总体而言,该干预措施在减轻常规操作的疼痛方面无效。家长在场并未对操作表现产生负面影响,也未增加临床医生的焦虑。在场的家长比不在场的家长焦虑程度更低。
一般来说,家长表示孩子接受操作时他们希望在场。本研究结果挑战了传统观念,即家长在场会对我们成功完成操作的能力产生负面影响。我们应鼓励希望在场的家长在操作过程中陪伴。