Barber B A, Pegram P S, High K P
Department of Internal Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1042, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Oct;23(4):718-22. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.4.718.
The records of 206 patients with advanced infection due to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 who were receiving prophylaxis with clindamycin/primaquine (C/P), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), or dapsone to prevent Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) were retrospectively examined. Two hundred sixty-two patient-years of prophylaxis were accrued (176.2 of TMP-SMZ, 63.4 of dapsone, and 22.8 of C/P). The rates of PCP in the TMP-SMZ, dapsone, and C/P groups were 3.4, 11.0, and 30.7 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Pairwise comparisons showed C/P to be less effective than TMP-SMZ (relative risk [RR], 9.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.03-26.83). A similar trend was apparent for C/P vs. dapsone (RR, 2.78; 95% CI, 0.98-7.93). When only those receiving primary prophylaxis were analyzed, C/P recipients remained at greater risk than TMP-SMZ recipients (RR, 13.19; 95% CI, 3.54-49.12) and dapsone recipients (RR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.12-13.31). Failure of C/P prophylaxis could be due, at least in part, to underdosing (clindamycin, 300 mg/d; primaquine, 15 mg/d). C/P recipients had more nonspecific diarrhea than did TMP-SMZ recipients (RR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.61-5.55).
对206例1型人类免疫缺陷病毒晚期感染患者的记录进行了回顾性检查,这些患者正在接受克林霉素/伯氨喹(C/P)、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMZ)或氨苯砜预防卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎(PCP)。共积累了262患者年的预防数据(TMP-SMZ为176.2患者年,氨苯砜为63.4患者年,C/P为22.8患者年)。TMP-SMZ、氨苯砜和C/P组的PCP发生率分别为每100患者年3.4、11.0和30.7例。两两比较显示C/P的效果不如TMP-SMZ(相对危险度[RR],9.02;95%置信区间[CI],3.03 - 26.83)。C/P与氨苯砜相比也有类似趋势(RR,2.78;95%CI,0.98 - 7.93)。仅分析接受初级预防的患者时,接受C/P的患者比接受TMP-SMZ的患者(RR,13.19;95%CI,3.54 - 49.12)和接受氨苯砜的患者(RR,3.85;95%CI,1.12 - 13.31)面临的风险更高。C/P预防失败至少部分可能是由于剂量不足(克林霉素,300mg/天;伯氨喹,15mg/天)。接受C/P的患者比接受TMP-SMZ的患者有更多非特异性腹泻(RR,2.99;95%CI,1.61 - 5.55)。