Rello J, Rodriguez R, Jubert P, Alvarez B
Intensive Care Department, Hospital de Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Oct;23(4):723-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.4.723.
Ninety-five patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) who were > or = 65 years of age were studied prospectively. A definite pathogen was identified in 37 cases (38.9%) and was most commonly Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or another gram-negative bacillus. The overall death rate was 40%. Eighty-three patients required mechanical ventilation and 40 needed vasoactive drugs. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of death was higher in cases involving rapid radiological spread (relative risk [RR] = 6.99; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.54-31.70), shock (RR = 6.70; 95% CI = 2.13-21.02), previous steroid treatment or immunosuppression (RR = 5.50; 95% CI = 0.77-39.10), acute renal failure (RR = 3.88; 95% CI = 1.30-11.59), or an APACHE II score of > 22 on admission (RR = 2.25; 95% CI = 0.73-6.95). We conclude that SCAP in elderly patients is associated with high mortality, but it is inappropriate to withhold intensive care on account of age. The presence of complications and the severity of illness at initial presentation were the major variables affecting outcome. Except for immunosuppression, comorbidities did not seem to influence outcome. Finally, our data reinforce the current American Thoracic Society guidelines concerning therapy for patients with SCAP.
对95例年龄≥65岁的重症社区获得性肺炎(SCAP)患者进行了前瞻性研究。37例(38.9%)患者明确了病原体,最常见的是肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌或其他革兰阴性杆菌。总死亡率为40%。83例患者需要机械通气,40例需要血管活性药物。多因素分析显示,在以下情况中死亡风险更高:影像学快速进展(相对危险度[RR]=6.99;95%置信区间[95%CI]=1.54 - 31.70)、休克(RR = 6.70;95%CI = 2.13 - 21.02)、既往使用类固醇治疗或存在免疫抑制(RR = 5.50;95%CI = 0.77 - 39.10)、急性肾衰竭(RR = 3.88;95%CI = 1.30 - 11.59)或入院时急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)>22分(RR = 2.25;95%CI = 0.73 - 6.95)。我们得出结论,老年患者的SCAP与高死亡率相关,但因年龄而不给予重症监护是不合适的。并发症的存在和初始表现时疾病的严重程度是影响预后的主要变量。除免疫抑制外,合并症似乎不影响预后。最后,我们的数据强化了美国胸科学会目前关于SCAP患者治疗的指南。