• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性肺炎:病因及入院时严重程度标准的实用性。

Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission.

作者信息

Neill A M, Martin I R, Weir R, Anderson R, Chereshsky A, Epton M J, Jackson R, Schousboe M, Frampton C, Hutton S, Chambers S T, Town G I

机构信息

Canterbury Respiratory Research Group, Christchurch School of Medicine, New Zealand.

出版信息

Thorax. 1996 Oct;51(10):1010-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.10.1010.

DOI:10.1136/thx.51.10.1010
PMID:8977602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC472650/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community acquired pneumonia remains an important cause of hospital admission and carries an appreciable mortality. Criteria for the assessment of severity during admission have been developed by the British Thoracic Society (BTS). A study was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a severity rule based on a modification of the BTS prognostic rules applied on admission, to compare severity as assessed by medical staff with the modified rule, and to determine the microbiological cause of community acquired pneumonia in Christchurch.

METHODS

A 12 month study of all adults admitted to Christchurch Hospital with community acquired pneumonia was undertaken. Three hundred and sixteen consecutive patients with suspected community acquired pneumonia were screened for inclusion. Variables obtained from the history, examination, investigations, and initial treatment were examined for association with mortality.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty five patients met the inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 58 years (range 18-97). A microbiological diagnosis was made in 181 cases (71%), Streptococcus pneumonia (39%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (16%), Legionella species (11%), and Haemophilus influenzae (11%) being the most commonly identified organisms. Patients had a 36-fold increased risk of death if any two of the following were present on admission: respiratory rate > or = 30/min, diastolic BP < or = 60 mm Hg, urea > 7 mmol/l, or confusion. The severity rule identified 19 of the 20 patients who died and six of eight patients admitted to the intensive care unit as having life threatening community acquired pneumonia. The sensitivity of the modified rule for predicting death was 0.95 and the specificity 0.71. In 47 cases (21%) the clinical team appeared to underestimate the severity of the illness.

CONCLUSIONS

The organisms responsible for community acquired pneumonia in Christchurch are similar to those reported from other centres except for Legionella species which were more common than in most studies. The modification of the BTS prognostic rules applied as a severity indicator at admission performed well and could be incorporated into management guidelines.

摘要

背景

社区获得性肺炎仍然是住院的重要原因,且死亡率可观。英国胸科学会(BTS)已制定了入院时严重程度评估标准。开展了一项研究,以确定基于对入院时应用的BTS预后规则进行修改的严重程度规则的敏感性和特异性,比较医务人员评估的严重程度与修改后的规则,并确定克赖斯特彻奇社区获得性肺炎的微生物病因。

方法

对所有因社区获得性肺炎入住克赖斯特彻奇医院的成年人进行了为期12个月的研究。对316例连续疑似社区获得性肺炎的患者进行筛选以纳入研究。检查从病史、检查、调查和初始治疗中获得的变量与死亡率的相关性。

结果

255例患者符合纳入标准。他们的平均年龄为58岁(范围18 - 97岁)。181例(71%)做出了微生物学诊断,最常鉴定出的病原体为肺炎链球菌(39%)、肺炎支原体(16%)、军团菌属(11%)和流感嗜血杆菌(11%)。如果入院时出现以下任何两项情况,患者死亡风险增加36倍:呼吸频率≥30次/分钟、舒张压≤60 mmHg、尿素>7 mmol/L或意识模糊。严重程度规则识别出20例死亡患者中的19例以及8例入住重症监护病房的患者中的6例患有危及生命的社区获得性肺炎。修改后的规则预测死亡的敏感性为0.95,特异性为0.71。在47例(21%)病例中,临床团队似乎低估了疾病的严重程度。

结论

除军团菌属比大多数研究更常见外,克赖斯特彻奇社区获得性肺炎的病原体与其他中心报告的相似。作为入院时严重程度指标应用的BTS预后规则的修改表现良好,可纳入管理指南。

相似文献

1
Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission.社区获得性肺炎:病因及入院时严重程度标准的实用性。
Thorax. 1996 Oct;51(10):1010-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.10.1010.
2
Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and prognostic index evaluation.社区获得性肺炎:病因学及预后指数评估
Thorax. 1991 Jun;46(6):413-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.6.413.
3
Community-acquired pneumonia in adults in British hospitals in 1982-1983: a survey of aetiology, mortality, prognostic factors and outcome. The British Thoracic Society and the Public Health Laboratory Service.1982 - 1983年英国医院成人社区获得性肺炎:病因、死亡率、预后因素及转归的调查。英国胸科学会和公共卫生实验室服务部
Q J Med. 1987 Mar;62(239):195-220.
4
Multiple pathogens in adult patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia: a one year prospective study of 346 consecutive patients.社区获得性肺炎成年住院患者中的多种病原体:对346例连续患者的一年前瞻性研究
Thorax. 1996 Feb;51(2):179-84. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.2.179.
5
Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society criteria to predict severe community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae.美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会标准对预测肺炎链球菌所致重症社区获得性肺炎的验证
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;27(8):968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.037.
6
Severity prediction rules in community acquired pneumonia: a validation study.社区获得性肺炎严重程度预测规则:一项验证研究。
Thorax. 2000 Mar;55(3):219-23. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.3.219.
7
Aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective study among adults requiring admission to hospital.社区获得性肺炎的病因:一项针对需住院治疗的成年人的前瞻性研究。
Thorax. 1995 May;50(5):543-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.5.543.
8
Defining prognostic factors in the elderly with community acquired pneumonia: a case controlled study of patients aged > or = 75 yrs.确定老年社区获得性肺炎患者的预后因素:一项针对年龄≥75岁患者的病例对照研究。
Eur Respir J. 2001 Feb;17(2):200-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.17202000.
9
Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients in Jordan.约旦住院患者社区获得性肺炎的病因
Saudi Med J. 2006 Jun;27(6):813-6.
10
Adult community-acquired pneumonia in Malaysia: prediction of mortality from severity assessment on admission.马来西亚成人社区获得性肺炎:入院时严重程度评估对死亡率的预测
Respirology. 2004 Aug;9(3):379-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00604.x.

引用本文的文献

1
[Guidelines for the management of community pneumonia in adult who needs hospitalization].[成人社区获得性肺炎住院治疗管理指南]
Med Intensiva. 2005 Feb;29(1):21-62. doi: 10.1016/S0210-5691(05)74199-1. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
2
Longitudinal metabolite profiling of Streptococcus pneumoniae-associated community-acquired pneumonia.肺炎链球菌相关性社区获得性肺炎的纵向代谢组学分析。
Metabolomics. 2024 Mar 5;20(2):35. doi: 10.1007/s11306-024-02091-5.
3
Prognostic utility of paraspinal muscle index in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.老年社区获得性肺炎患者椎旁肌指数的预后效用
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;11(2):171-180. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.142. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
4
Clinically defined aspiration pneumonia is an independent risk factor associated with long-term hospital stay: a prospective cohort study.临床定义的吸入性肺炎是与长期住院相关的独立危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02641-y.
5
Low Vitamin C Concentrations in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Resolved with Pragmatic Administration of Intravenous and Oral Vitamin C.社区获得性肺炎患者维生素C浓度低,通过实用的静脉和口服维生素C给药得以解决。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Aug 14;12(8):1610. doi: 10.3390/antiox12081610.
6
Does Pneumococcal Vaccination Have an Effect on Hospital Costs?肺炎球菌疫苗对医院成本有影响吗?
Thorac Res Pract. 2023 May;24(3):165-169. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22171.
7
Adjunctive intravenous then oral vitamin C for moderate and severe community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults: feasibility of randomized controlled trial.辅助静脉内然后口服维生素 C 治疗住院成人中、重度社区获得性肺炎:随机对照试验的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 23;13(1):11879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37934-z.
8
The prognostic value of rapid risk scores among patients with community-acquired pneumonia : A retrospective cohort study.社区获得性肺炎患者快速风险评分的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Oct;135(19-20):507-516. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02238-9. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
9
The Clinical Utility of Relative Bradycardia for Identifying Cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Pneumonia Cohort Study.相对心动过缓对识别新型冠状病毒肺炎病例的临床效用:一项回顾性肺炎队列研究。
Intern Med. 2023 Jul 1;62(13):1931-1938. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1469-22. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
10
Rapid Assessment of COVID-19 Mortality Risk with GASS Classifiers.使用GASS分类器快速评估COVID-19死亡风险
Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 9;11(3):831. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030831.

本文引用的文献

1
Chlamydia pneumoniae.肺炎衣原体
Thorax. 1993 Jan;48(1):1-4. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.1.1.
2
Legionnaires' disease.军团病
Chest. 1994 Jun;105(6):1817-25. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.6.1817.
3
Is pneumonia really the old man's friend? Two-year prognosis after community-acquired pneumonia.肺炎真的是老年人的“朋友”吗?社区获得性肺炎后的两年预后。
Lancet. 1993 Jul 3;342(8862):30-3. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91887-r.
4
Prognostic analysis and predictive rule for outcome of hospital-treated community-acquired pneumonia.医院治疗社区获得性肺炎结局的预后分析及预测规则
Eur Respir J. 1995 Mar;8(3):392-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08030392.
5
Aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective study among adults requiring admission to hospital.社区获得性肺炎的病因:一项针对需住院治疗的成年人的前瞻性研究。
Thorax. 1995 May;50(5):543-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.5.543.
6
Failure of intensive care unit support to influence mortality from pneumococcal bacteremia.重症监护病房支持未能影响肺炎球菌血症的死亡率。
JAMA. 1983 Feb 25;249(8):1055-7.
7
Comparative radiographic features of community acquired Legionnaires' disease, pneumococcal pneumonia, mycoplasma pneumonia, and psittacosis.社区获得性军团菌病、肺炎球菌肺炎、支原体肺炎和鹦鹉热的X线比较特征
Thorax. 1984 Jan;39(1):28-33. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.1.28.
8
Mental impairment in the elderly.老年人的智力损害
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1973 Jul;7(4):305-17.
9
Normal values for sixteen blood constituents in the elderly.老年人十六种血液成分的正常数值。
Age Ageing. 1973 Feb;2(1):14-23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/2.1.14.
10
Impact of the respiratory intensive care unit on survival of patients with acute respiratory failure.呼吸重症监护病房对急性呼吸衰竭患者生存率的影响。
Chest. 1972 Jul;62(1):94-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.62.1.94.