Balfour-Lynn I M, Tasker R C
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London.
J Med Ethics. 1996 Oct;22(5):279-81. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.5.279.
We have conducted a retrospective study of deaths on a paediatric medical intensive care unit over a two-year period and reviewed similar series from outside the UK. There were 89 deaths out of 651 admission (13.7% mortality). In almost two-thirds of the cases death occurred with a decision to limit medical treatment or withdraw mechanical ventilation, implying that additional or further therapy was considered futile. We highlight this as a crucially important issue in the practice of intensive care. More comprehensive studies are needed to help clinicians derive consensus on what constitutes a futile intervention, and therefore when such an intervention should be withheld. This will help families and society better understand the limitations of intensive care.
我们对一家儿科重症监护病房两年期间的死亡病例进行了回顾性研究,并查阅了英国以外地区的类似系列研究。651例入院病例中有89例死亡(死亡率为13.7%)。在近三分之二的病例中,死亡发生在决定限制医疗治疗或撤掉机械通气时,这意味着额外的或进一步的治疗被认为是无效的。我们强调这是重症监护实践中的一个至关重要的问题。需要进行更全面的研究,以帮助临床医生就什么构成无效干预达成共识,从而确定何时应停止这种干预。这将有助于家庭和社会更好地理解重症监护的局限性。