Huo T I, Wu J C, Lai C R, Lu C L, Sheng W Y, Lee S D
Department of Medicine, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
J Hepatol. 1996 Oct;25(4):439-44. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(96)80202-9.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis D virus superinfection in hepatitis B virus carriers produces additional damage in an already injured liver. Earlier reports noted that the development of hepatocellular carcinoma may be accelerated in hepatitis D virus-superinfected patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of hepatitis D virus on the clinical course of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.
A total of 42 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma cases seropositive for antibody against hepatitis D virus antigen (anti-HDV) were found from 1986 to 1994; the clinical manifestations, treatment and outcomes were compared with 255 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma cases seropositive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen but seronegative for anti-HDV.
The mean age was 60 years in both groups of patients. Other features, including sex, duration of follow-up, presence of cirrhosis or ascites, serum biochemistry, status of HBV-e antigen, and gross and microscopic tumor appearance, were not significantly different between the two groups. Though more patients in the anti-HDV-positive group underwent active treatment (operation or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization) than those in the anti-HDV-negative group (54.8% in 42 versus 34.9% in 255 cases, p = 0.02), the cumulative 4-year survival rates (9.5% versus 9.8%) were similar. For the anti-HDV-positive hepatocellular carcinoma patients, tumor size < 5 cm and active treatment were favorable prognostic predictors associated with survival > 18 months.
Hepatitis D virus superinfection does not accelerate the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The clinical manifestations were similar, and the outcome in anti-HDV-positive patients was not worse than in the general HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma patients, as long as they were diagnosed at an early stage and actively treated.
背景/目的:乙肝病毒携带者发生丁型肝炎病毒重叠感染会对本已受损的肝脏造成额外损害。早期报告指出,丁型肝炎病毒重叠感染患者的肝细胞癌发展可能会加速。本研究旨在探讨丁型肝炎病毒对乙肝病毒相关肝细胞癌临床病程的影响。
1986年至1994年共发现42例连续的丁型肝炎病毒抗原抗体(抗-HDV)血清学阳性的肝细胞癌病例;将其临床表现、治疗及预后与255例连续的乙肝病毒表面抗原血清学阳性但抗-HDV血清学阴性的肝细胞癌病例进行比较。
两组患者的平均年龄均为60岁。两组患者的其他特征,包括性别、随访时间、肝硬化或腹水的存在情况、血清生化指标、乙肝e抗原状态以及肿瘤的大体和显微镜下表现,均无显著差异。尽管抗-HDV阳性组接受积极治疗(手术或经动脉化疗栓塞)的患者比抗-HDV阴性组多(42例中占54.8%,255例中占34.9%,p = 0.02),但4年累积生存率(分别为9.5%和9.8%)相似。对于抗-HDV阳性的肝细胞癌患者,肿瘤大小<5 cm和积极治疗是与生存>18个月相关的良好预后预测因素。
丁型肝炎病毒重叠感染不会加速肝细胞癌的发展。只要早期诊断并积极治疗,其临床表现相似,抗-HDV阳性患者的预后并不比一般乙肝相关肝细胞癌患者差。