Urquhart C J, Hepworth J B
Department of Information and Library Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Dyfed, United Kingdom.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Oct;84(4):482-9.
This paper discusses the Value project, which assessed the value to clinical decision-making of information supplied by National Health Service (NHS) library and information services. The project not only showed how health libraries in the United Kingdom help clinicians in decision-making but also provided quality assurance guidelines for these libraries to help make their information services more effective. The paper reviews methods and results used in previous studies of the value of health libraries, noting that methodological differences appear to affect the results. The paper also discusses aspects of user involvement, categories of clinical decision-making, the value of information to present and future clinical decisions, and the combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments of value, as applied to the Value project and the studies reviewed. The Value project also demonstrated that the value placed on information depends in part on the career stage of the physician. The paper outlines the structure of the quality assurance tool kit, which is based on the findings and methods used in the Value project.
本文讨论了“价值项目”,该项目评估了英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)图书馆及信息服务所提供信息对临床决策的价值。该项目不仅展示了英国的健康图书馆如何协助临床医生进行决策,还为这些图书馆提供了质量保证指南,以帮助其提高信息服务的有效性。本文回顾了以往关于健康图书馆价值研究中所使用的方法和结果,指出方法上的差异似乎会影响研究结果。本文还讨论了用户参与的各个方面、临床决策的类别、信息对当前和未来临床决策的价值,以及应用于“价值项目”和所回顾研究的价值定量与定性评估的结合。“价值项目”还表明,对信息的重视程度部分取决于医生的职业阶段。本文概述了基于“价值项目”的研究结果和方法构建的质量保证工具包的结构。