• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

啤酒厂中的特定腐败微生物及其检测用实验室培养基。

Specific spoilage organisms in breweries and laboratory media for their detection.

作者信息

Jespersen L, Jakobsen M

机构信息

Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Dairy and Food Science, Food Microbiology, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 1996 Nov;33(1):139-55. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(96)01154-3.

DOI:10.1016/0168-1605(96)01154-3
PMID:8913814
Abstract

The Gram positive bacteria are generally regarded as the most hazardous beer spoilage organisms in modern breweries, especially the lactobacilli: L. brevis, L. lindneri, L. curvatus, L. casei, L. buchneri, L. coryneformis, L. plantarum, L. brevisimilis, L. malefermentans and L. parabuchneri and the pediococci: P damnosus, P. inopinatus and P. dextrinicus. Micrococcus kristinae is the only species within the micrococci relevant to brewing. The Gram negative strictly anaerobic bacteria are apparently increasing in importance and include Pectinatus cerevisiiphilus, Pectinatus frisingensis and Selenomonas lacticifex, reported as obligate beer spoilage organisms: Zymophilus raffinosivorans as a potential beer spoilage organism; Megasphaera cerevisiae as an obligate spoilage organism of low alcohol beer and Zymomonas mobilis as capable of spoiling primed beer. With improved process technology the importance of aerobic bacteria has decreased and the same applies for the Gram negative aerobic bacteria Hafnia protea and Enterobacter cloacae which are capable of surviving beer fermentation. Beer spoilage organisms include several so-called wild yeasts, of which Saccharomyces species are generally considered the most important. Even though the detection of beer spoilage organisms by cultivation in laboratory media does not always provide the specificity and the sensitivity required, the use of selective media and incubation conditions still appears to be the method preferred by breweries. The media used depend on the type of sample, the specificity required and, for detection of wild yeasts, to some extent, the characteristics of the culture yeast. Among the media reported so far no single medium can be used to detect all members within a group of specific beer spoilage organisms and further work on the development of improved substrates are required both for bacteria and wild yeasts.

摘要

革兰氏阳性菌通常被认为是现代啤酒厂中最具危害性的啤酒腐败微生物,尤其是乳酸菌:短乳杆菌、林氏乳杆菌、弯曲乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌、布氏乳杆菌、棒状乳杆菌、植物乳杆菌、类短乳杆菌、有害发酵乳杆菌和副布氏乳杆菌,以及片球菌:有害片球菌、意外片球菌和糊精片球菌。克里斯蒂微球菌是微球菌属中唯一与酿造相关的菌种。革兰氏阴性严格厌氧菌的重要性显然在增加,包括啤酒果胶杆菌、弗里斯兰果胶杆菌和乳酸新月形单胞菌,它们被报道为专性啤酒腐败微生物;拉氏嗜 raffinosivorans 被认为是潜在的啤酒腐败微生物;酿酒巨球形菌是低酒精啤酒的专性腐败微生物,而运动发酵单胞菌能够使加酵母的啤酒变质。随着工艺技术的改进,需氧细菌的重要性有所降低,革兰氏阴性需氧菌变形哈夫尼亚菌和阴沟肠杆菌也是如此,它们能够在啤酒发酵过程中存活。啤酒腐败微生物包括几种所谓的野生酵母,其中酿酒酵母属通常被认为是最重要的。尽管通过在实验室培养基中培养来检测啤酒腐败微生物并不总能提供所需的特异性和灵敏度,但使用选择性培养基和培养条件似乎仍然是啤酒厂首选的方法。所使用的培养基取决于样品类型、所需的特异性,对于野生酵母的检测,在一定程度上还取决于培养酵母的特性。在迄今为止报道的培养基中,没有一种单一的培养基可用于检测特定啤酒腐败微生物组中的所有成员,因此需要进一步开展工作来开发改进的细菌和野生酵母培养基。

相似文献

1
Specific spoilage organisms in breweries and laboratory media for their detection.啤酒厂中的特定腐败微生物及其检测用实验室培养基。
Int J Food Microbiol. 1996 Nov;33(1):139-55. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(96)01154-3.
2
Beer spoilage bacteria and hop resistance.啤酒腐败细菌与啤酒花抗性
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Dec 31;89(2-3):105-24. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00153-3.
3
Dipstick Assay for Rapid Detection of Beer Spoilage Organisms.用于快速检测啤酒腐败微生物的试纸条检测法
J AOAC Int. 2018 Nov 1;101(6):1913-1919. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.17-0479. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
4
Taxonomic study of anaerobic, gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria from breweries: emended description of Pectinatus cerevisiiphilus and description of Pectinatus frisingensis sp. nov., Selenomonas lacticifex sp. nov., Zymophilus raffinosivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., and Zymophilus paucivorans sp. nov.啤酒厂厌氧革兰氏阴性杆状细菌的分类学研究:啤酒果胶杆菌的修订描述及弗里斯兰果胶杆菌新种、乳酸栖月形单胞菌新种、嗜棉籽糖发酵单胞菌新属新种及少食发酵单胞菌新种的描述
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1990 Jan;40(1):19-27. doi: 10.1099/00207713-40-1-19.
5
Development of a species-specific PCR assay for identification of the strictly anaerobic bacterium Selenomonas lacticifex found in biofilm-covered surfaces in brewery bottling halls.开发一种物种特异性聚合酶链反应检测方法,用于鉴定在啤酒厂装瓶车间生物膜覆盖表面发现的严格厌氧细菌乳酸新月形单胞菌。
J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Nov;117(5):1328-35. doi: 10.1111/jam.12610. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
6
Pectinatus spp. - Unpleasant and recurrent brewing spoilage bacteria.果胶杆菌属 - 令人不快且反复出现的酿造污染菌。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2021 Jan 2;336:108900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108900. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
7
Physiology and development of Pectinatus cerevisiiphilus and Pectinatus frisingensis, two strict anaerobic beer spoilage bacteria.啤酒酿造中两种严格厌氧的腐败菌——嗜酒果胶杆菌和弗赖辛果胶杆菌的生理学与发育
Int J Food Microbiol. 1997 Mar 18;35(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(96)01206-8.
8
Epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies specific for the directly cross-linked mesodiaminopimelic acid peptidoglycan found in the anaerobic beer spoilage bacterium Pectinatus cerevisiiphilus.针对厌氧啤酒腐败菌嗜果胶酿酒酵母中直接交联的中-二氨基庚二酸肽聚糖的单克隆抗体的表位作图。
Can J Microbiol. 1999 Sep;45(9):779-85. doi: 10.1139/w99-071.
9
Comparative genetic and physiological characterisation of Pectinatus species reveals shared tolerance to beer-associated stressors but halotolerance specific to pickle-associated strains.比较果胶杆菌属物种的遗传和生理特性揭示了它们对啤酒相关应激因素的共同耐受性,但对泡菜相关菌株的耐盐性具有特异性。
Food Microbiol. 2020 Sep;90:103462. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103462. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
10
Detection of beer spoilage bacteria Megasphaera and Pectinatus by polymerase chain reaction and colorimetric microplate hybridization.通过聚合酶链反应和比色微孔板杂交检测啤酒腐败菌巨球形菌属和果胶杆菌属
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Dec 8;45(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00154-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The two faces of microorganisms in traditional brewing and the implications for no- and low-alcohol beers.传统酿造中微生物的两面性及其对无醇和低醇啤酒的启示
Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 19;15:1346724. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1346724. eCollection 2024.
2
Novelty of Italian Grape Ale (IGA) beer: Influence of the addition of Gamay macerated grape must or dehydrated Aleatico grape pomace on the aromatic profile.意大利葡萄艾尔啤酒(IGA)的新颖之处:添加浸渍过的佳美葡萄汁或脱水的阿莱蒂科葡萄皮渣对香气特征的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 25;9(10):e20422. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20422. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Microbial Communities in Retail Draft Beers and the Biofilms They Produce.
零售生啤中的微生物群落及其产生的生物膜。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0140421. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01404-21.
4
The Ability of Hop Extracts to Reduce the Methane Production of .啤酒花提取物降低. 甲烷生成能力的研究
Archaea. 2021 Nov 5;2021:5510063. doi: 10.1155/2021/5510063. eCollection 2021.
5
Influence of malt composition on the quality of a top fermented beer.麦芽成分对上面发酵啤酒品质的影响。
J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Jun;58(6):2295-2303. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04740-8. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
6
Evaluation of ITS PCR and RFLP for Differentiation and Identification of Brewing Yeast and Brewery 'Wild' Yeast Contaminants.评估内转录间隔区PCR和限制性片段长度多态性用于区分和鉴定酿造酵母及啤酒厂“野生”酵母污染物
J Inst Brew. 2011;117(4):556-568. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00504.x. Epub 2012 May 16.
7
Microbial Dynamics in Traditional and Modern Sour Beer Production.传统与现代酸啤酒生产中的微生物动态。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Jul 2;86(14). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00566-20.
8
Modeling the inactivation of Lactobacillus brevis DSM 6235 and retaining the viability of brewing pitching yeast submitted to acid and chlorine washing.对酿酒用巴氏酵母(Lactobacillus brevis DSM 6235)进行酸和氯洗涤时,模拟其失活动力学和保持其存活能力。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 May;104(9):4071-4080. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10534-x. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
9
Seasonal Microbial Conditions of Locally Made Yoghurt (Shalom) Marketed in Some Regions of Cameroon.喀麦隆部分地区销售的本地制作酸奶(沙洛姆)的季节性微生物状况
Int J Food Sci. 2017;2017:5839278. doi: 10.1155/2017/5839278. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Yeast Creates a Niche for Symbiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria through Nitrogen Overflow.酵母通过氮溢出为共生乳酸菌创造小生境。
Cell Syst. 2017 Oct 25;5(4):345-357.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 27.