Suppr超能文献

用于法医案件工作的HLA DQA1和多标记验证:标准样本、再现性和混合样本。

HLA DQA1 and Polymarker validations for forensic casework: standard specimens, reproducibility, and mixed specimens.

作者信息

Gross A M, Guerrieri R A

机构信息

Minnesota Forensic Science Laboratory, St. Paul, USA.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 1996 Nov;41(6):1022-6.

PMID:8914290
Abstract

This study describes the testing performed by the Minnesota Forensic Science Laboratory (MFSL) to validate the Amplitype DQA1 and Amplitype Polymarker (PM) PCR Amplification and Typing Kits before implementation for casework. All studies were based on the analysis of mock forensic case samples, which were assembled from various biological samples from individuals at the MFSL. To address the validation of standard specimens, DNA was isolated from semen, vaginal secretions, saliva, urine, and blood samples. Typing results from all tissues from a particular individual yielded the same typing results using both the DQA1 and PM systems. Reproducibility between laboratories was evaluated by having duplicate samples analyzed by a second laboratory. The Roche Biomedical Laboratories (RBL) were sent a duplicate set of mock cases and all analyses including extraction, quantitation, amplification, and typing were performed at the RBL using their established testing procedures. All typing results for both laboratories, from the approximate 30 single source samples analyzed, were in agreement. Mixed specimens were evaluated by examining the results obtained from semen/vaginal, semen/saliva, semen/blood, semen/ urine, and semen/vaginal/blood mixtures. All typing results of these mixtures for both laboratories were in agreement. It was determined that by incorporating a wash step of the sperm cell pellet, a complete separation of the nonsperm cell fraction was more likely to be attained. After completing the above studies, as well as population studies, environmental insult studies, and proficiency testing, the MFSL determined that both kits were suitable for use on forensic casework.

摘要

本研究描述了明尼苏达法医科学实验室(MFSL)在将Amplitype DQA1和Amplitype多标记物(PM)PCR扩增及分型试剂盒用于实际案件检验之前所进行的验证测试。所有研究均基于对模拟法医案件样本的分析,这些样本由MFSL的个体的各种生物样本组装而成。为了验证标准样本,从精液、阴道分泌物、唾液、尿液和血液样本中提取了DNA。使用DQA1和PM系统对来自特定个体的所有组织进行分型,结果相同。通过让第二个实验室分析重复样本,评估了不同实验室之间的再现性。向罗氏生物医学实验室(RBL)发送了一组重复的模拟案件,所有分析,包括提取、定量、扩增和分型,均在RBL使用其既定的测试程序进行。两个实验室对大约30个单一来源样本的所有分型结果均一致。通过检查从精液/阴道、精液/唾液、精液/血液、精液/尿液和精液/阴道/血液混合物中获得的结果,对混合样本进行了评估。两个实验室对这些混合物的所有分型结果均一致。经确定,通过对精子细胞沉淀进行洗涤步骤,更有可能实现非精子细胞部分的完全分离。在完成上述研究以及群体研究、环境损伤研究和能力验证测试后,MFSL确定这两种试剂盒均适用于法医案件检验。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验