Fidell S, Silvati L, Howe R, Pearsons K S, Tabachnick B, Knopf R C, Gramann J, Buchanan T
BBN Acoustic Technologies, Canoga Park, California 91303-2853, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Nov;100(5):2909-18. doi: 10.1121/1.417102.
On-site and telephone opinion surveys were conducted to assess outdoor recreationists' annoyance with aircraft overflights of wilderness areas. Although current technology for measuring noise exposure does not yet permit accurate and cost-effective estimates of dosage-response relationships in outdoor recreational settings, it was nonetheless possible to construct a rough relationship between estimated aircraft noise exposure and annoyance from the data of the on-site study. In the second survey, telephone interviews were administered to another sample of outdoor recreationists within 2 weeks of their return from visits to 12 wilderness areas. The prevalence of aircraft noise-induced annoyance (in any degree) among respondents in all wilderness areas ranged from 5% to 32%. The prevalence of a consequential degree of aircraft noise-induced annoyance among respondents was less than 5% in all wilderness areas combined. Noise-induced annoyance proved to be a more direct measure of the effects of aircraft overflights on recreationists than more global measures such as visit satisfaction or intent to revisit.
开展了现场和电话意见调查，以评估户外休闲者对荒野地区上空飞机飞越的烦恼程度。尽管目前用于测量噪声暴露的技术尚无法在户外休闲环境中准确且经济高效地估计剂量反应关系，但利用现场研究的数据构建估计飞机噪声暴露与烦恼程度之间的大致关系仍是可行的。在第二项调查中，对另一组户外休闲者样本进行了电话访谈，这些休闲者在从12个荒野地区游玩归来的两周内接受了访谈。所有荒野地区受访者中飞机噪声引发烦恼（任何程度）的发生率在5%至32%之间。在所有荒野地区的受访者中，飞机噪声引发严重烦恼程度的发生率合计不到5%。事实证明，与诸如游玩满意度或再次游玩意愿等更综合的指标相比，噪声引发的烦恼是衡量飞机飞越对休闲者影响的更直接指标。
