Jung C H, Thomas J A
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996 Nov 1;335(1):61-72. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0482.
The disulfide-reducing activities of glutaredoxin, thioredoxin, protein disulfide isomerase, glutathione, and cysteine were directly compared with a mixture of hepatocyte 35S-glutathiolated proteins as the substrate. Dethiolation of individual 35S-labeled protein bands from the mixture of hepatocyte proteins was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. All of the 35S-labeled protein bands could be completely dethiolated by glutaredoxin, thioredoxin, protein disulfide isomerase, glutathione, or cysteine. On a molar basis glutaredoxin was over 10 times more effective than either thioredoxin or protein disulfide isomerase. Dethiolation rates of individual proteins varied in minor ways. For example, glutaredoxin dethiolated the 15-, 30-, and 48-kDa protein bands 3 to 4 times faster than the 27-, 28-, and 77-kDa bands. Glutaredoxins from pig liver or from bovine heart had the same specificity and similar activity. The rate of dethiolation by glutathione alone was low compared to the glutaredoxin-catalyzed process, but all 35S-labeled protein bands could be reduced by glutathione, cysteine, or dithiothreitol. Glutathione was clearly more effective than cysteine when these two thiols were compared on the basis of the concentration of thiolate anion available at neutral pH. Therefore, glutathione is a more specific reductant of S-glutathiolated proteins than is cysteine but it is much less effective than glutaredoxin. Since glutaredoxin activity in cells is 10 times higher than the concentration used in these experiments, ample activity is available to account for substantial rates of dethiolation in vivo. Thioredoxin is quite inefficient as a reductant of S-glutathiolated proteins, but it was reasoned that it might first reduce glutaredoxin, which then could reduce the S-glutathiolated protein. A combination of thioredoxin and glutaredoxin was effective. It is proposed that glutaredoxin is the principal agent responsible for protein dethiolation in vivo. The effectiveness of glutaredoxin, thioredoxin, and protein disulfide isomerase as reductants for protein disulfide bonds was examined with insulin as the substrate. Protein disulfide isomerase was very effective and thioredoxin was nearly as effective. Human thioredoxin was similar to Escherichia coli thioredoxin in reactivity and specificity. Glutaredoxin did not facilitate insulin reduction at equal concentrations. Thus, protein disulfide isomerase and thioredoxin are more effective than glutaredoxin as reductants of insulin protein disulfides. The apparent reduction potential of pig liver glutaredoxin (-0.159 +/- 0.004 V) was determined by measuring the amount of reduced glutaredoxin in equilibrium with mixtures of glutathione and glutathione disulfide. Glutaredoxin was a weaker reductant than E. coli thioredoxin (-0.260 V) and was similar to protein disulfide isomerase (-0.11 to -0.19 V). The role of these proteins as disulfide reductants is not determined solely by thermodynamic considerations. A glutathione binding site at the dithiol region of glutaredoxin may be of primary importance for its function in protein dethiolation, while a different specific peptide binding site in thioredoxin may be more suited to certain protein disulfide structures.
以肝细胞35S-谷胱甘肽化蛋白混合物为底物,直接比较了谷氧还蛋白、硫氧还蛋白、蛋白质二硫键异构酶、谷胱甘肽和半胱氨酸的二硫键还原活性。通过SDS-PAGE分析肝细胞蛋白混合物中各个35S标记蛋白条带的脱巯基作用。谷氧还蛋白、硫氧还蛋白、蛋白质二硫键异构酶、谷胱甘肽或半胱氨酸均可使所有35S标记的蛋白条带完全脱巯基。以摩尔计,谷氧还蛋白的效率比硫氧还蛋白或蛋白质二硫键异构酶高10倍以上。各个蛋白质的脱巯基速率略有差异。例如,谷氧还蛋白使15 kDa、30 kDa和48 kDa蛋白条带脱巯基的速度比27 kDa、28 kDa和77 kDa蛋白条带快3至4倍。猪肝或牛心来源的谷氧还蛋白具有相同的特异性和相似的活性。与谷氧还蛋白催化的过程相比,单独谷胱甘肽的脱巯基速率较低,但所有35S标记的蛋白条带均可被谷胱甘肽、半胱氨酸或二硫苏糖醇还原。当基于中性pH下可用的硫醇盐阴离子浓度比较这两种硫醇时,谷胱甘肽明显比半胱氨酸更有效。因此,谷胱甘肽是比半胱氨酸更特异的S-谷胱甘肽化蛋白还原剂,但比谷氧还蛋白的效果差得多。由于细胞中的谷氧还蛋白活性比这些实验中使用的浓度高10倍,因此有足够的活性来解释体内大量的脱巯基速率。硫氧还蛋白作为S-谷胱甘肽化蛋白的还原剂效率相当低,但据推测它可能首先还原谷氧还蛋白,然后谷氧还蛋白再还原S-谷胱甘肽化蛋白。硫氧还蛋白和谷氧还蛋白的组合是有效的。有人提出谷氧还蛋白是体内负责蛋白质脱巯基的主要因子。以胰岛素为底物,研究了谷氧还蛋白、硫氧还蛋白和蛋白质二硫键异构酶作为蛋白质二硫键还原剂的有效性。蛋白质二硫键异构酶非常有效,硫氧还蛋白几乎同样有效。人硫氧还蛋白在反应性和特异性方面与大肠杆菌硫氧还蛋白相似。在相同浓度下,谷氧还蛋白不促进胰岛素的还原。因此,作为胰岛素蛋白二硫键的还原剂,蛋白质二硫键异构酶和硫氧还蛋白比谷氧还蛋白更有效。通过测量与谷胱甘肽和谷胱甘肽二硫化物混合物处于平衡状态的还原型谷氧还蛋白的量,测定了猪肝谷氧还蛋白的表观还原电位(-0.159±0.004 V)。谷氧还蛋白是比大肠杆菌硫氧还蛋白(-0.260 V)弱的还原剂,与蛋白质二硫键异构酶(-0.11至-0.19 V)相似。这些蛋白质作为二硫键还原剂的作用不仅仅由热力学因素决定。谷氧还蛋白二硫醇区域的谷胱甘肽结合位点可能对其在蛋白质脱巯基中的功能至关重要,而硫氧还蛋白中不同的特定肽结合位点可能更适合某些蛋白质二硫键结构。