Hueston W J, McClaflin R R, Claire E
University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine, Eau Claire Family Practice Residency 54701, USA.
J Fam Pract. 1996 Nov;43(5):461-7.
Increases in cesarean section frequency may be dependent on institutional or individual practitioner characteristics. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the diagnosis of fetal distress was influenced by time of day or institutional factors.
Chart review was performed on a random sample of women stratified by month of delivery at each institution (N = 8647). All women who gave birth by elective cesarean section or whose labor was induced were excluded from analysis (n = 2207), leaving a total population of 6440 for study. Women were stratified based on risk status, and comparisons were made between the time of delivery, maternal socioeconomic factors, and obstetric variables for those who had a cesarean section for fetal distress compared with women who gave birth vaginally.
Large variations in rates of cesarean delivery for fetal distress were observed among the participating institutions (range 0.9% to 3.0% of all deliveries). Increased rates of cesarean delivery for fetal distress were observed in nonwhite women and those who had had a previous cesarean delivery. Also, a significant increase in rates of cesarean section for fetal distress was noted between the hours of 9:00 PM and 3:00 AM. When adjusted for risk status, previous cesarean delivery, race, use of pitocin augmentation, length of labor, and site, time of day was still a significant predictor (adjusted odds ratio = 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.29) for cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
Cesarean delivery for the diagnosis of fetal distress appears to vary depending on institutional and other nonclinical factors. The observation that cesarean deliveries for fetal distress peak during nighttime hours raises the possibility that the interpretation of fetal monitor tracing is influenced by physician and patient fatigue or other clinical factors.
剖宫产率的增加可能取决于机构或个体从业者的特征。本研究的目的是探讨胎儿窘迫的诊断是否受一天中的时间或机构因素影响。
对每个机构按分娩月份分层的随机抽样女性进行病历审查(N = 8647)。所有择期剖宫产分娩或引产的女性被排除在分析之外(n = 2207),留下6440名女性作为研究总体。根据风险状况对女性进行分层,并对因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产的女性与经阴道分娩的女性在分娩时间、产妇社会经济因素和产科变量方面进行比较。
参与研究的机构中,因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产的比率差异很大(占所有分娩的0.9%至3.0%)。非白人女性和既往有剖宫产史的女性因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产的比率增加。此外,晚上9点至凌晨3点之间因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产的比率显著增加。在对风险状况、既往剖宫产史、种族、使用缩宫素加强宫缩、产程长度和分娩地点进行调整后,一天中的时间仍然是因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产的显著预测因素(调整后的优势比 = 1.56,95%置信区间1.06至2.29)。
因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产似乎因机构和其他非临床因素而异。胎儿窘迫剖宫产在夜间达到高峰这一观察结果增加了胎儿监护仪描记图的解读受医生和患者疲劳或其他临床因素影响的可能性。