Trussell J E, Kurtz R M, Strube M J
Washington University, Department of Psychology, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Am J Clin Hypn. 1996 Jul;39(1):37-47. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1996.10403363.
This study investigated the impact of Difficulty Level and Type of Suggestion upon the durability of posthypnotic suggestion over an 8-week period. Seventy-eight highly susceptible subjects selected by both the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Form A (HGSHS:A) and Stanford Hypnotic Scale of Susceptibility: Form C (SHSS:C) were assigned to six groups (two levels of Difficulty x three Types of Suggestion). S's were tested for posthypnotic suggestion at 1, 3, 6, and 8 weeks. A 2 x 3 x 4 (Difficulty x Suggestion x Time) factorial ANOVA was conducted, with Time treated as a repeated-measure. The outcome variable at each time was either pass or fail for relevant suggestion. We found a significant Time effect, a significant Difficulty effect, and a significant Time x Difficulty interaction. Fewer subjects passed the difficult suggestions than passed the easy suggestions; fewer passed suggestions at a latter time; and the decay in pass rate was more pronounced for the easy suggestion condition, due largely to the higher initial pass rate. Type of Suggestion was not significant, nor were any of the other interactions. Clinical implications were discussed.
本研究调查了难度水平和暗示类型对催眠后暗示在8周期间的持续性的影响。通过哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A式(HGSHS:A)和斯坦福催眠易感性量表C式(SHSS:C)挑选出的78名高度易感受试者被分为六组(两种难度水平×三种暗示类型)。受试者在第1、3、6和8周接受催眠后暗示测试。进行了2×3×4(难度×暗示×时间)析因方差分析,将时间作为重复测量因素。每次测试的结果变量为相关暗示的通过或未通过。我们发现了显著的时间效应、显著的难度效应以及显著的时间×难度交互作用。通过困难暗示的受试者比通过简单暗示的受试者少;在后期通过暗示的受试者更少;并且简单暗示条件下通过率的下降更为明显,这主要是由于初始通过率较高。暗示类型不显著,其他任何交互作用也不显著。文中讨论了临床意义。