Botté C, Janot C
Blood Transfusion Centre, Unité Virale, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11 Suppl 4:19-21. doi: 10.1093/ndt/11.supp4.19.
The prevalence of HCV seropositivity observed in various populations raise the issue of the contamination routes and the corollary exclusion criteria of risk subjects from blood donation. There are various diagnostic methods for HCV infection. The biological diagnosis is reached at three levels: circulating antibody screening by second and third generation tests; screening validation by immunoblot, to distinguish between the various HCV specific antibodies and detection of viral nucleic acids by molecular biology. In blood donors in France, 0.5% were seropositive in 1990, 0.3% in 1992 and 0.1% (essentially new donors) in 1995. This decrease is the result of improved test specificity and sensitivity and donor selection. In Europe, prevalences range from 0.1-1.5% with a North-South gradient. In other countries: 0.3% in Canada, 0.6% in the USA, 1-2% in China, Thailand and Japan, from 0.2% to 20% in Africa. In risk populations contamination by blood is manifest: HCV seropositivity in 80% of drug abusers, 10-60% of dialysis patients before 1991, more than 80% of haemophiliacs treated before 1986, 10% of labile blood product recipients before 1988. The nosocomial transmission figures are even worse: 2-5% of hospitalized patients are thought to be contaminated. Perinatal and sexual contaminations are not excluded (3-30%) and they vary according to the degree of exposure and the viral type of post-transfusional HCV infection: prevention implies several types of action: information and education of populations about risk factors; medical interview before each blood donation; systematic serological testing; manufacturing measures for stable (SD processing) and labile (deleukocytation, plasma seroattenuation) blood products; prescription recommendations and follow-up measures; haemovigilance (clinical and biological follow-up of all recipients of human blood products).
在不同人群中观察到的丙型肝炎病毒血清阳性率引发了感染途径以及从献血者中排除高危人群这一必然问题。丙型肝炎病毒感染有多种诊断方法。生物学诊断分三个层面:通过第二代和第三代检测进行循环抗体筛查;通过免疫印迹进行筛查验证,以区分各种丙型肝炎病毒特异性抗体;通过分子生物学检测病毒核酸。在法国的献血者中,1990年血清阳性率为0.5%,1992年为0.3%,1995年为0.1%(主要是新献血者)。这种下降是检测特异性和灵敏度提高以及献血者选择改善的结果。在欧洲,患病率在0.1%至1.5%之间,呈北低南高梯度。在其他国家:加拿大为0.3%,美国为0.6%,中国、泰国和日本为1%至2%,非洲为0.2%至20%。在高危人群中,血液传播感染明显:80%的药物滥用者丙型肝炎病毒血清呈阳性,1991年前10%至60%的透析患者、1986年前接受治疗的血友病患者中超过80%、1988年前接受不稳定血液制品的患者中有10%。医院内传播数据更糟:据认为2%至5%的住院患者受到感染。围产期和性传播感染也不排除(3%至30%),且因接触程度和输血后丙型肝炎病毒感染的病毒类型而异:预防需要采取多种行动:对人群进行危险因素信息和教育;每次献血前进行医学问诊;系统的血清学检测;稳定血液制品(SD处理)和不稳定血液制品(白细胞去除、血浆血清减弱)的生产措施;处方建议和随访措施;血液警戒(对所有人类血液制品接受者进行临床和生物学随访)。