Grados P, Bravo N, Battilana C
Hospital de Apoyo Departamental María Auxiliadora, Lima, Peru.
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1996 Mar;30(1):36-42.
The purpose of the study reported here was to compare the bactericidal effectiveness of tetracycline and co-trimoxazole (a combination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim) in treating cholera. The study, an open-ended random trial using adult patients with cholera cases confirmed by stool culture, was carried out in March 1993 at the Cholera Treatment Unit (CTU) of the Hospital de Apoyo Departmental María Auxiliadora in Lima, Peru. A total of 107 subjects were divided into two groups (A and B). The 50 in Group A received 500 mg of tetracycline orally every 6 hours for 3 days; the 57 in Group B received co-trimoxazole (160 mg of trimethoprim and 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole) orally every 12 hours for 3 days. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, duration of symptoms prior to hospital admission, time at which antibiotic treatment was initiated, and clinical evolution. Control stool cultures of specimens obtained after treatment showed Vibrio cholerae O-1 present in 2% of the Group A and 12.3% of the Group B patients, and also showed V. cholerae non-O-1 present in 2% of the Group A patients and 3.5% of the Group B patients. Overall, it was concluded that both therapeutic treatment regimens were effective and that the strains of V. cholerae observed in the southern sector of the city of Lima were still susceptible to both antibiotics.
本文所报道研究的目的是比较四环素和复方新诺明(磺胺甲恶唑和甲氧苄啶的组合)治疗霍乱的杀菌效果。该研究为开放性随机试验,使用经粪便培养确诊为霍乱病例的成年患者,于1993年3月在秘鲁利马的玛丽亚奥克西利亚多省支持医院霍乱治疗科开展。总共107名受试者被分为两组(A组和B组)。A组的50名患者每6小时口服500毫克四环素,持续3天;B组的57名患者每12小时口服复方新诺明(160毫克甲氧苄啶和800毫克磺胺甲恶唑),持续3天。两组在年龄、性别、入院前症状持续时间、开始抗生素治疗的时间以及临床进展方面具有可比性。治疗后获得的标本的对照粪便培养显示,A组2%的患者和B组12.3%的患者存在霍乱弧菌O-1,A组2%的患者和B组3.5%的患者存在非O-1霍乱弧菌。总体而言,得出的结论是两种治疗方案均有效,并且在利马市南部地区观察到的霍乱弧菌菌株对这两种抗生素仍然敏感。