Suppr超能文献

赖脯胰岛素[赖氨酸(B28),脯氨酸(B29)人胰岛素]对既往接受胰岛素治疗的1型糖尿病和2型糖尿病患者的免疫作用。

Immunologic effects of insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] in IDDM and NIDDM patients previously treated with insulin.

作者信息

Fineberg N S, Fineberg S E, Anderson J H, Birkett M A, Gibson R G, Hufferd S

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Indianapolis, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes. 1996 Dec;45(12):1750-4. doi: 10.2337/diab.45.12.1750.

Abstract

Insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] is a rapidly absorbed analog that has diminished tendency to self-associate. In four open-label, 1-year-long international randomized trials, we contrasted the immunogenicity of insulin lispro versus regular human insulin (RHI) in patients previously treated with insulin who had IDDM or NIDDM. Using a self-blank subtraction assay, we assessed sera for the presence of insulin-specific antibodies (ISA), insulin lispro-specific antibodies (LSA), and cross-reactive antibodies (CRA). Basal insulin needs were provided either with human ultralente (UL) or NPH insulins. After 2 to 4 weeks of therapy with RHI plus UL or RHI plus NPH, 50% of patients were randomly assigned to begin insulin lispro or continue on RHI. At baseline, few pretreated patients had LSA (0-4%) and approximately 10% had ISA, whereas 41-45% of patients with IDDM and 23-27% of patients with NIDDM had CRA (IDDM vs. NIDDM, P < 0.001). Within studies, no significant differences were noted over time in ISA, LSA, or CRA attributable to the type of short-acting insulin. When data were pooled, inconsistent changes were noted in ISA and LSA (LSA were greater in NIDDM vs. IDDM at baseline, P = 0.001, and ISA were greater in IDDM vs. NIDDM at 6 months, P = 0.007). Significant levels of CRA were more common in IDDM at all times (P < 0.001, P = 0.022, and P = 0.002 at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively). For patients receiving insulin lispro, no significant changes occurred in antibody status among IDDM and NIDDM patients throughout the study (became positive, remained positive, became negative, or remained negative). IDDM patients were more likely to develop or maintain CRA levels (P = 0.008 vs. NIDDM), whereas antibody levels were comparable among positive individuals. No evidence was noted that insulin lispro differs in immunogenicity from RHI in previously treated IDDM and NIDDM patients.

摘要

赖脯胰岛素[赖氨酰(B28)、脯氨酰(B29)人胰岛素]是一种吸收迅速的类似物,其自我缔合倾向减弱。在四项开放标签、为期1年的国际随机试验中,我们比较了赖脯胰岛素与常规人胰岛素(RHI)在先前接受胰岛素治疗的1型糖尿病(IDDM)或2型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者中的免疫原性。使用自空白扣除法,我们评估血清中胰岛素特异性抗体(ISA)、赖脯胰岛素特异性抗体(LSA)和交叉反应性抗体(CRA)的存在情况。基础胰岛素需求通过人超长效胰岛素(UL)或中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)提供。在用RHI加UL或RHI加NPH治疗2至4周后,50%的患者被随机分配开始使用赖脯胰岛素或继续使用RHI。在基线时,很少有接受过治疗的患者有LSA(0 - 4%),约10%的患者有ISA,而41 - 45%的IDDM患者和23 - 27%的NIDDM患者有CRA(IDDM与NIDDM相比,P < 0.001)。在各项研究中,未观察到由于短效胰岛素类型导致的ISA、LSA或CRA随时间的显著差异。当汇总数据时,发现ISA和LSA有不一致的变化(基线时NIDDM患者的LSA高于IDDM患者,P = 0.001;6个月时IDDM患者的ISA高于NIDDM患者,P = 0.007)。在所有时间点,显著水平的CRA在IDDM患者中更常见(基线、6个月和12个月时分别为P < 0.001、P = 0.022和P = 0.002)。对于接受赖脯胰岛素治疗的患者,在整个研究过程中,IDDM和NIDDM患者的抗体状态均未发生显著变化(变为阳性、保持阳性、变为阴性或保持阴性)。IDDM患者更有可能产生或维持CRA水平(与NIDDM相比,P = 0.008),而阳性个体之间的抗体水平相当。没有证据表明在先前接受治疗的IDDM和NIDDM患者中,赖脯胰岛素的免疫原性与RHI不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验