• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压与结局研究。从临床试验到临床流行病学。

Hypertension and outcomes research. From clinical trials to clinical epidemiology.

作者信息

Psaty B M, Siscovick D S, Weiss N S, Koepsell T D, Rosendaal F R, Lin D, Heckbert S R, Wagner E H, Furberg C D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1996 Feb;9(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00015-5.

DOI:10.1016/0895-7061(96)00015-5
PMID:8924268
Abstract

Outcomes research seeks to identify effective evidence-based methods of providing the best medical care. While randomized clinical trials (RCT) usually provide the clearest answers, they are often not done or not practicable. More than a decade after the introduction of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, clinical trial data about their effect on major disease endpoints in patients with hypertension are still not available. The primary alternatives are the use of randomized trials that include surrogate endpoints, such as level of blood pressure or extent of carotid atherosclerosis, and the use of observational studies that include major disease endpoints. Both approaches, their strengths and limitations, are discussed in detail. The possibility of residual confounding limits the strength of inferences that can be drawn from observational studies. Similarly, the possibility of important drug effects, other than those involving the surrogate endpoint, limits the inferences that can be drawn from randomized trials that rely solely on surrogate outcomes as guides to therapy. In the absence of evidence from large clinical trials that include major disease endpoints, treatment decisions and guidelines need to synthesize the best available information from a variety of sources. Consistency of findings across various study designs, outcomes, and populations is critical to the practice of evidence-based medicine and the effort to maximize the health benefits of antihypertensive therapies.

摘要

结果研究旨在确定提供最佳医疗护理的有效循证方法。虽然随机临床试验(RCT)通常能给出最清晰的答案,但它们往往未开展或不具可行性。在钙通道阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂问世十多年后,关于它们对高血压患者主要疾病终点影响的临床试验数据仍未可得。主要的替代方法是使用包含替代终点(如血压水平或颈动脉粥样硬化程度)的随机试验,以及使用包含主要疾病终点的观察性研究。将详细讨论这两种方法及其优缺点。残余混杂的可能性限制了能从观察性研究得出的推断力度。同样,除涉及替代终点之外的重要药物效应的可能性,也限制了仅依赖替代结果作为治疗指导的随机试验所能得出的推断。在缺乏包含主要疾病终点的大型临床试验证据的情况下,治疗决策和指南需要综合来自各种来源的最佳可用信息。不同研究设计、结果和人群中的研究结果一致性,对于循证医学实践以及使抗高血压治疗的健康益处最大化的努力而言至关重要。

相似文献

1
Hypertension and outcomes research. From clinical trials to clinical epidemiology.高血压与结局研究。从临床试验到临床流行病学。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Feb;9(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00015-5.
2
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2.
3
Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents. A systematic review and meta-analysis.与用作一线药物的抗高血压疗法相关的健康结局。一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 1997 Mar 5;277(9):739-45.
4
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Cochrane背景下:儿童高血压的药物干预
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975.
5
The 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part II - therapy.2005年加拿大高血压教育计划关于高血压管理的建议:第二部分——治疗
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):657-72.
6
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.
7
The 2004 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part II--Therapy.2004年加拿大高血压管理指南:第二部分——治疗
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):41-54.
8
Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid?当前高血压治疗的推荐方案:它们仍然有效吗?
J Hypertens Suppl. 2002 Feb;20(1):S3-10.
9
Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus through inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin system.通过抑制肾素-血管紧张素系统预防2型糖尿病
Drugs. 2004;64(22):2537-65. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464220-00004.
10
The renin-angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil compared with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in clinical trials versus routine practice: insights from the prospective EARLY registry.在临床试验与常规实践中比较肾素-血管紧张素受体阻滞剂阿齐沙坦美洛昔酯与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利:来自前瞻性EARLY注册研究的见解
Trials. 2015 Dec 19;16:581. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1100-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of cardiac events with azithromycin-A prediction model.阿奇霉素致心脏不良事件风险——预测模型
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240379. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison of Cardiac Events Associated With Azithromycin vs Amoxicillin.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林相关心脏不良事件的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2016864. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16864.
3
Assessing the impact of prescribed medicines on health outcomes.评估处方药对健康结果的影响。
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Feb 15;4:1. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-1.
4
Pharmacoeconomic burden of undertreating hypertension.高血压治疗不足的药物经济学负担
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(14):907-28. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422140-00002.
5
Cost per millimeter of mercury lowering is a measure of economic value for antihypertensive agents.每降低一毫米汞柱的成本是衡量抗高血压药物经济价值的一个指标。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000 Dec;2(6):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-996-0036-5.
6
Randomized clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: all that glitters is not gold.抗高血压药物的随机临床试验:闪光的未必都是金子。
CMAJ. 1998 Sep 8;159(5):488-90.