Kramar A, Potvin D, Hill C
Départment de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996 Aug;44(4):364-71.
Phase II trials play a key role in the development of a treatment, because they are crucial in deciding whether or not to proceed to phase III. In the event of the evaluation of a new treatment given to only one group of subjects, multi-stage designs were developed to include subjects in phase II trials. Gehan's two stage designs stop inclusion of subjects if no success is observed among the first n1 subjects. They are easy to use, but have the disadvantage of exposing many subjects to an inefficient treatment at the second stage. Fleming's multi-stage designs and Simon's two stage designs permit the early termination of a trial when the intermediate results are extreme, either in favor of the efficiency or in favor of the inefficiency of the treatment. Simon's plans minimize either the average or the maximum number of subjects exposed to ineffective treatment. Ensign's three stage designs combine the first stage of Gehan with the two stages of Simon. These plans are interesting because they can reject a treatment quickly after a long run of failures which minimizes the average number of subjects exposed to an ineffective treatment.
II期试验在治疗方法的研发中起着关键作用,因为它们对于决定是否进入III期试验至关重要。在仅对一组受试者进行新治疗评估的情况下,开发了多阶段设计以纳入II期试验的受试者。Gehan的两阶段设计在最初的n1名受试者中未观察到成功时停止纳入受试者。它们易于使用,但有一个缺点,即在第二阶段会让许多受试者接受无效治疗。Fleming的多阶段设计和Simon的两阶段设计允许在中期结果极端时,无论是有利于治疗的有效性还是无效性,提前终止试验。Simon的方案将接受无效治疗的受试者的平均数量或最大数量降至最低。Ensign的三阶段设计将Gehan的第一阶段与Simon的两个阶段结合起来。这些方案很有意思,因为在经历一连串失败后,它们可以迅速拒绝一种治疗方法,从而将接受无效治疗的受试者的平均数量降至最低。