Kravitz R L, Callahan E J, Paterniti D, Antonius D, Dunham M, Lewis C E
University of California, Davis, Division of General Medicine, Sacramento 95817, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Nov 1;125(9):730-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-9-199611010-00004.
Patients' expectations and the role they play in medical care are increasingly considered to be important, but the factors that influence these expectations have not been well studied.
To examine the factors that influence patients' expectations for care in office practice.
Qualitative inquiry nested within a large clinical survey.
Three general internal medicine practices in one mid-sized city in northern California.
688 patients visiting their internists' offices were surveyed (response rate, 86%); 88 patients who reported one or more omissions of care on a post-visit questionnaire and were available for a telephone interview 1 to 7 days after the visit were included in the qualitative inquiry.
Proportion of surveyed patients who reported one or more omissions of care, and qualitative analysis of the sources of patients' expectations, as determined from the telephone interviews. Interviews focused on the sources of expectations and perceptions of omission. Using an iterative process and working by consensus, investigators developed coding categories on a randomly selected 50% of the transcripts. The other 50% of the sample was used for validation.
The 125 patients who had unmet expectations perceived omissions that were related to physician preparation for the visit (23%), history taking (26%), physical examination (30%), diagnostic testing (28%), prescription of medication (19%), referral to specialists (26%), and physician-patient communication (15%). Unmet expectations were shaped by patients' current somatic symptoms (intensity of symptoms, functional impairment, duration of symptoms, and perceived seriousness of symptoms) (74%); perceived vulnerability to illness (related to age, family history, personal lifestyle, or previously diagnosed conditions) (50%); past experiences (personal or familial) with similar illnesses (42%); and knowledge acquired from physicians, friends, family, or the media (54%).
Patients' expectations for care are derived from multiple sources; their complexity should discourage simple schemes for "demand management." Nevertheless, the results of this study may help physicians to take a more empathetic stance toward their patients' requests and to devise more successful strategies for clinical negotiation.
患者的期望及其在医疗保健中所起的作用日益被视为重要因素,但影响这些期望的因素尚未得到充分研究。
探讨影响门诊患者护理期望的因素。
嵌套在大型临床调查中的定性研究。
加利福尼亚州北部一个中等规模城市的三家普通内科诊所。
对688名到内科医生办公室就诊的患者进行了调查(回复率为86%);88名在就诊后问卷中报告有一项或多项护理遗漏且在就诊后1至7天可接受电话访谈的患者被纳入定性研究。
报告有一项或多项护理遗漏的被调查患者比例,以及通过电话访谈确定的患者期望来源的定性分析。访谈重点关注期望来源和对遗漏的认知。研究人员采用迭代过程并通过共识确定编码类别,对随机抽取的50%的访谈记录进行编码。另一半样本用于验证。
125名期望未得到满足的患者察觉到的护理遗漏与医生就诊准备(23%)、病史采集(26%)、体格检查(30%)、诊断性检查(28%)、药物处方(19%)、转诊至专科医生(26%)以及医患沟通(15%)有关。未满足的期望受到患者当前躯体症状(症状强度、功能损害、症状持续时间以及对症状严重程度的认知)(74%)、对疾病的易感性认知(与年龄、家族史、个人生活方式或先前诊断的疾病有关)(50%)、过去(个人或家族)患类似疾病的经历(42%)以及从医生、朋友、家人或媒体获得的知识(54%)的影响。
患者的护理期望源自多个方面;其复杂性应避免采用简单的“需求管理”方案。尽管如此,本研究结果可能有助于医生对患者的诉求采取更具同理心的态度,并制定更成功的临床沟通策略。